Shahid Afridi’s fan following in the country as well as across the border has dropped drastically. From reading and approving comments on the site where readers praised Afridi’s captaincy, his humble speech after the semi-final and his views on Pakistan-India relations – suddenly, the very same news stories and blogs have been swamped with angry comments, blasting the skipper for his remarks about the Indian media.

In order to understand what the brouhaha is about, watch Afridi’s interview with a local TV channel. He then went on to give another interview, this time to NDTV and tried to set the record straight but it seems as though the damage has been done.

But before we get caught up in what he said or didn’t say or should have said, let us backtrack a little. Afridi is a sportsman. Period. That Pakistani sportsmen have, in the past year, decided to become goodwill ambassadors on behalf of Pakistan is simply put, incredible. But that does not make them diplomats or even political analysts who need to sound off on every single official meeting between Pakistan and India, or any other policy for that matter.

When Aisam-ul Haq spoke at the US Open presentation ceremony, we were shocked, teary-eyed and proud – all at once. That Aisam decided to use the platform to speak about the country when the speech could have easily been about his hard work, made all of us so very proud to have someone so eloquent and earnest represent us. Our hearts filled with joy and we welcomed him back with open arms.

After years, we finally found a spokesman in the Pakistan cricket team who made us equally proud. Afridi had won over not just our hearts but those in India as well. Lest we bring Afridi crashing down from the pedestal we had placed him on, we need to realise that although we love to crown people as heroes and saviours, we are just as quick in bringing about their downfall – we often fall prey to being our own worst critic.

We all know that Shahid Afridi is very candid and does not he mince his words– quite similar to his batting style. Whether his words were or weren’t taken out of context in that interview, why are we repeatedly questioning a cricketer about Pakistan-India relations? Let bureaucrats and diplomats handle matters related to foreign policy, given how delicate such issues are to begin with, especially our checkered history with India.

Sure, he has an opinion on politics just as much as every other citizen does – but does this mean his thoughts on diplomacy are more important than the upcoming tour of the West Indies? More important questions to ask him (and for him to discuss in these press conferences) would be how the team plans to continue making a bigger impact in international cricket, who the next wicket-keeper will be and so much more. As @Tazeen said on Twitter: That man is tired, let him sleep. Mrs. Afridi, take his phone and hide it.

Either that, or Afridi needs to give fewer interviews – especially those not related to cricket.

Amna Khalique is the Features Editor at Dawn.com

The views expressed in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

Opinion

Editorial

Smog hazard
Updated 05 Nov, 2024

Smog hazard

The catastrophe unfolding in Lahore is a product of authorities’ repeated failure to recognise environmental impact of rapid urbanisation.
Monetary policy
05 Nov, 2024

Monetary policy

IN an aggressive move, the State Bank on Monday reduced its key policy rate by a hefty 250bps to 15pc. This is the...
Cultural power
05 Nov, 2024

Cultural power

AS vital modes of communication, art and culture have the power to overcome social and international barriers....
Disregarding CCI
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Disregarding CCI

The failure to regularly convene CCI meetings means that the process of democratic decision-making is falling apart.
Defeating TB
04 Nov, 2024

Defeating TB

CONSIDERING the fact that Pakistan has the fifth highest burden of tuberculosis in the world as per the World Health...
Ceasefire charade
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Ceasefire charade

The US talks of peace, while simultaneously arming and funding their Israeli allies, are doomed to fail, and are little more than a charade.