President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had warned that the US planned to sabotage Pakistan’s nuclear programme in order to dominate the country and undermine its sovereignty.—Reuters photo

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan sought on Wednesday to play down Iranian warning that the United States was planning to sabotage its nuclear facilities by emphasising that its atomic programme was safe and secure.

“Pakistan is a nuclear-weapon state. This is an established fact. We do not comment on our strategic programme,” was the brief Foreign Office response to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s warning that the US planned to sabotage Pakistan’s nuclear programme in order to dominate the country and undermine its sovereignty.

Beyond this brief statement no official comment was available. However, background discussions with officials indicated that the warning was taken as an attempt by Tehran to draw Islamabad into its dispute with Washington over its own nuclear programme. “It is unhelpful to pit one against the other,” said an official, who didn’t want to be identified.

Pak-Iran relations have a long history of mistrust. Some officials believe that the warning was a political move by President Ahmadinejad to dissipate the pressure on his own nuclear programme after IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, reported to have received information about existence of possible military dimensions in Iran’s nuclear programme.

That Pakistani leaders gave little credence to the Iranian warning was noticeable from the fact that they did not even think of asking Iran for sharing of information, which Mr Ahmadinejad had described as “precise”. “No, we are not asking them for details,” an official said.

The reaction to the warning contrasted with the fears that were noticeable until a few days ago, particularly in the aftermath of the attack on PNS Mehran, with a lot of whispering about certain countries trying to invoke Chapter 7 of the UN because of possible threats to security of the country’s nuclear weapons. Nato Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen had said last month that security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons was a matter of concern.

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...