British Defence Secretary Liam Fox, second left, arrives for a round table meeting of Nato defence ministers and International Security Assistance Force members at Nato headquarters on October 6, 2011. — Photo by AP

LONDON: British Defence Secretary Liam Fox's political career hung in the balance on Monday as he prepared to face a parliamentary grilling over his friend's reported involvement in government affairs.

Fox on Sunday responded to accusations that he had an inappropriate working relationship with friend Adam Werritty, saying he was “very sorry” for “giving the impression of wrongdoing”.

In a statement he also accepted it was “a mistake to allow distinctions to be blurred between my professional responsibilities and my personal loyalties to a friend”.

But the minister said he would answer “all questions” about Werritty's involvement in government business, including Afghanistan and Libya, during the scheduled House of Commons defence questions on Monday.

Fox insisted that “at no stage” did he provide classified information or briefings to Werritty — who has no official government role — or assist the businessman in his commercial endeavours.

The under-fire minister also revealed he had apologised to Prime Minister David Cameron for meeting a commercial supplier without the presence of an official, and was working to legislate against such meetings in the future.

Cameron on Saturday said that Fox had his “full confidence” despite the allegations about Werritty, who was best man at Fox's wedding.

But hours later Downing Street said Cameron wanted a preliminary report setting out the facts by Monday and was not prepared to wait until an internal Ministry of Defence (MoD) inquiry reports back in a fortnight.

Fox, who visited Libya on Saturday, ordered the MoD inquiry on Friday into claims that Werritty had privileged access to him despite having no official role or security clearance.

Fox stopped short of apologising for the nature of his relationship with Werritty, and regretted only that he “may have given the impression of wrongdoing” and “given third parties the misleading impression that Werritty was an official adviser”.

The Daily Telegraph newspaper reported on Monday that Fox had used public funds to pay Werritty as a parliamentary researcher.

The row escalated on Saturday when The Observer newspaper carried footage on its website of Werritty apparently attending a meeting between Fox and Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapakse in London in 2010.

The Telegraph on Monday also claimed that Werritty had acted as Fox's personal envoy to the Asian nation and had organised meetings with senior ministers.

Other newspapers reported that Werritty had brokered a meeting in Dubai in June between Fox and the Porton Group, a company hoping to sell phone call encryption technology to the British military.

Porton chief executive Harvey Boulter discussed with Fox whether British troops in Afghanistan could use the technology to call home without being detected by the Taliban, the Financial Times said.

The Conservative lawmaker argued the Dubai meeting came about by chance while he was on a stopover from Afghanistan.

Boulter called this claim “kind of ridiculous” in comments published in Monday's Guardian newspaper.

“It's a bit like me bumping into you in a pub in London and buying you a beer and saying 'oh by the way can I meet the owner of the paper' and you saying 'oh sure', come on,” he said.

The defence chief said Sunday he had “learnt lessons” from the affair and that he would take greater care in the future to protect himself and the government from accusations of wrongdoing.

Labour lawmaker Jim Murphy, the shadow defence minister, said Sunday he had written to Cameron calling for a full investigation, highlighting “several shortcomings” in the current probes.

“The terms of reference are narrow and simply inadequate in light of the evidence that has come to light,” he added.

“It is important that the breadth of this inquiry matches the severity of the accusations.”

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary in the dock
Updated 22 Feb, 2025

Judiciary in the dock

Recent developments in SC and IHC certainly seem to have lent credibility to perception that judges perceived as a 'threat’ are being sidelined.
Paying taxes
22 Feb, 2025

Paying taxes

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s ‘hard talk’ at a retail business conference on Thursday was long ...
Rules for thee
22 Feb, 2025

Rules for thee

IT was a year ago when, in the tumultuous aftermath of the 2024 elections, the state banned X. Today, it remains...
Ukraine initiative
Updated 21 Feb, 2025

Ukraine initiative

Whether Trump’s Ukraine peace initiative succeeds or not, it will be difficult for Kyiv, Europe to face Russian military machine without US support.
High cost of SOEs
21 Feb, 2025

High cost of SOEs

THERE are losses and then some. The finance ministry’s latest overview of the federally owned state enterprises...
Poor impression
21 Feb, 2025

Poor impression

RECENT developments in the Senate have provided cause for concern on how parliamentary business is being conducted....