ON December 12, Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani emphasised importance of timely completion of 969mw Neelum-Jhelum hydropower project to minimise electricity loadshedding vital to economic development. This strategic project, which is also on the high priority list of Executive Committee of the National Economic Council (Ecnec), has been delayed, resulting in cost over-runs. Ecnec had approved the project at a total cost of $1,408 million, whereas the revised estimates are about $2,160 million.

Overall cost of integrated project is likely to escalate to over $3 billion including additional cost of construction of 500-kv transmission line by Wapda/NTDC to connect the project to national grid and higher compensation for resettlement of population.

The project, originally due for completion in July 2010, was scheduled to achieve commercial operations by October 2015 as per contractual terms. Now a minimum of another two years’ delay is estimated at this stage.

Historically, the project has been marred with faulty planning and lack of external financing. Initially, the project was offered to private sector under Power Policy 2002 on Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT) basis. In response, four international companies China International Water and Electric Corporation (CWE) and Sino Hydro Corporation of China, Excellence Group and Union Group of the UAE had presented proposals on different terms of implementation mode, financing and equity.

Total project cost, as offered by these firms on turnkey basis, was in the range of $1,500 million to $1,600 million, with 6 -7 years completion period. Though an MoU was signed with one of these companies in November 2003, there was no further headway.

Later, public sector was entrusted with the project that became a major constituent of Wapda’s Vision 2025, identified therein as a medium-term project.

Subsequently, the mega project was included in the National Energy Secu-rity Plan (2005-2030). Somehow, project initiation was delayed and interna-tional tenders were issued by Wapda in April 2006.

In response, only two Chinese companies participated for the EPC (engineering, procurement and construction) contract for the project that included civil works, electro-mechanical works and hydraulic steel structure. Though not meeting essential requirement of receiving at least three bids, the contract was awarded to a consortium of China Gezhouba Group Corporation (CGGC) and China National Machinery Import-Export Corporation (CMEC) on July 7, 2007, to avoid further delay in commencement of construction.

The Chinese consortium was to arrange $800 million through the Exim Bank of China. Commencement date being determined as January 2008, the project was to be completed by contractor in less than eight years. The EPC contract was awarded at a cost of $1,300 million – 58 per cent higher than 2001 estimates of $823 million and 18 per cent more than updated cost of $1,100 million based on re-design in the wake of October-2005 earthquake.

This was the single largest hydropower project contract ever awarded in the country’s history. Incidentally, it is also the largest hydropower project being undertaken by any Chinese contractor in a foreign country that deploys some 2,000 Chinese engineers, technicians and workers at site.

Physical progress achieved so far on the project is less than 30 per cent compared to about 50 per cent projected by the fourth year as per implementation schedule.

While infrastructure at site has progressed well and damming of diversion canal has been completed, work on main tunnel has just started. Likewise, fabrication of hydraulic structure and manufacturing of electrical and mechanical equipment has not yet been undertaken, whereas according to schedule, the supply was to commence from the third and fourth years of implementation, respectively.

Design and engineering for structure and machinery is still in progress.

First of its kind in the country, power station (including allied services and transmission system) has been designed underground to achieve optimum hydraulic head, given topographical limitations of the area. Thus, almost 98 per cent of the project structure will be underground.

According to contractual terms the consortium was required to mobilise all necessary machinery, equipment and accessories required for construction at his own cost and charges—and well in time. Also, the contractor could not arrange for adequate power required at site for construction activities that was his responsibility, and instead, is totally dependent on Wapda/AJK government for the supply of required 23MW electricity that remains interrupted and instable, causing delays in the ongoing works.

The strategic project, original plan of which was approved by the Ecnec as early as in December 1989, has been delayed so much, coupled with increased cost, that it would perhaps not be any more an economically viable power generation unit on completion. Generation cost projection, originally at 2.77 cents per kWh as per PC-1, then revised to 4.70 cents, is no longer valid now.

Opinion

Editorial

PTI in disarray
Updated 30 Nov, 2024

PTI in disarray

PTI’s protest plans came abruptly undone because key decisions were swayed by personal ambitions rather than political wisdom and restraint.
Tired tactics
30 Nov, 2024

Tired tactics

Matiullah's arrest appears to be a case of the state’s overzealous and misplaced application of the law.
Smog struggle
30 Nov, 2024

Smog struggle

AS smog continues to shroud parts of Pakistan, an Ipsos survey highlights the scope of this environmental hazard....
Solidarity with Palestine
Updated 29 Nov, 2024

Solidarity with Palestine

The wretched of the earth see in the Palestinian struggle against Israel a mirror of themselves.
Little relief for public
29 Nov, 2024

Little relief for public

INFLATION, the rate of increase in the prices of goods and services over a given period of time, has receded...
Right to education
29 Nov, 2024

Right to education

IT is troubling to learn that over 16,500 students of the University of Karachi (KU) have defaulted on fee payments...