Benazir Bhutto was killed in a gun and suicide bomb attack after an election rally in Rawalpindi on December 27, 2007. – File Photo

RAWALPINDI: An anti-terrorism court was told on Saturday that Benazir Bhutto was killed because she supported the Lal Masjid operation.

Magistrate Taufiq Ahmed, who had recorded confessional statements of Rafaqat Hussain, Husnain Gul and Aitzaz Shah on Feb 13, 2008, said the accused told him that they wanted to kill only Ms Bhutto and because of the deaths of 23 other people in the attack, which they regretted, they would accept any punishment awarded to them.

During the hearing of the Benazir assassination case in Adiala Jail, the magistrate read out the confessional statements before ATC Judge Shahid Rafique.

According to the statements, the accused received Rs360,000 from Baitullah Mehsood while his associates, Abdullah alias Saddam and Qari Ismail, provided them two suicide bombers Saeed alias Bilal and Ikramullah.

They purchased a pistol to be used by the suicide attacker because the plan was to kill Ms Bhutto near the stage during her rally in Liaqat Bagh on Dec 27, 2007.

The accused, along with the suicide bomber, visited the venue on the night before the rally and took him to their residence in Quaid-i-Azam Colony in Rawalpindi.

The accused brought the bomber to the venue early in the morning only to learn that because of tight security arrangements, it was difficult to get inside and near the stage. Then they deployed the bomber in front of the gate of Liaqat Bagh and another attacker Ikramullah at another exit point.

After carrying out the crime, the accused reassembled near Fawara Chowk, Raja Bazar, and later went to their residence.

The magistrate, who is a prosecution witness, could not answer a few questions raised during cross-examination by defence counsel Naseer Tanoli related to the arrest of juvenile Aitzaz Shah and remand of the accused.

Senior public prosecutor of the Federal Investigation Agency, Chaudhry Zulfiqar Ali, produced another witness (Usman Maftoon of a private cellular company – Warid) who submitted to the court phone call record of the accused, according to which they were at Liaqat Bagh at the time of the attack.

Meanwhile, the same court also took up an application filed by Sehba Musharraf against court orders for the seizure of the property of her husband, former president Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf.

FIA prosecutor Chaudhry Zulfiqar Ali raised a number of objections on the power of attorney of her newly-engaged counsel, Ilyas Siddiqui.

He said there was not a single signature of Ms Musharraf on the document, it was not duly notarised and consularised and could not establish that it was filed on her behalf.

The court directed Advocate Siddiqui to remove objections and adjourned the case to Feb 18.

Opinion

Perilous hour

Perilous hour

The question is whether there are any favourable factors in play today that can halt the ongoing escalation and avert a head-on clash.

Editorial

Doing business
Updated 05 May, 2025

Doing business

The government does not put in consistent effort to ensure the rule of law, the absence of which is what eventually drives investors away.
Destination unknown
05 May, 2025

Destination unknown

PAKISTANI politicians love to punch above their weight. With the return of the PML-N to power, it was but natural to...
Wounded childhood
05 May, 2025

Wounded childhood

PAKISTAN is unkind to its children. The NCRC’s State of Children in Pakistan Report 2024 scans the grim...
Failed narrative
Updated 04 May, 2025

Failed narrative

Few in the global arena, including India’s traditional foreign partners and the US, are buying New Delhi’s narrative.
Water allocation
04 May, 2025

Water allocation

THINGS may be looking up for farmers. With flows improving, the Indus River System Authority has summoned its...
Weaponising hunger
04 May, 2025

Weaponising hunger

OVER the course of 18 months, the world has seen unspeakable images come out of Gaza, but none are seared as...