In this Jan. 31, 2010 file photo, an unmanned US Predator drone flies over Kandahar Air Field, southern Afghanistan, on a moon-lit night.
The joint Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS) in Islamabad called for an immediate halt to drone strikes in FATA. - Photo by AP

WASHINGTON: The United States has indicated that the issue of drone strikes may also come up for discussion in future talks with Pakistan, although a State Department official noted that Washington never encourages public discussions on intelligence matters.

On Tuesday, a joint parliamentary committee in Islamabad unanimously adopted new rules of engagement for rebuilding Pakistan’s ties with the world’s only remaining superpower.

The recommendations call for an immediate halt to drone strikes in Fata and promise to reopen supply routes for US and Nato forces in Afghanistan, provided those are not used for brining weapons.

The recommendations also demand an unconditional apology from the US over the Nov. 26 airstrike on a Pakistani military post that killed 24 soldiers and caused the closing of supply routes.

At a news briefing at the State Department, spokesman Mark Toner was asked if the United States would also discuss the drone issue when it held talks with Pakistan on these recommendations.

“No, I can't talk about any intelligence matters from the podium,” the official replied. But “we have very robust counterterrorism cooperation.”

Reminded that Pakistan had already put the drone issue on the table, Mr Toner said: “I will just say that we're gonna talk about all aspects of our relationship moving forward.”

Asked if counter terrorism cooperation between the two countries included the drone strikes, Mr Toner said: “I cannot address that point.”

He added: “Let these conversations move forward. We're not going to take anything off the table or put anything on the table.”

The US official made clear that Washington wanted to build a “very constructive relationship” with Islamabad and was willing to engage Pakistan on the parliamentary recommendations as well to achieve this objective.

“We are ready to engage with the Pakistani government on this parliamentary review and on the issues that it has raised,” Mr Toner told a briefing in Washington.

“You know we want to build a very constructive relationship with Pakistan and one that is based on mutual understanding,” he said.

The State Department official said that although no visits or meetings had yet been planned for talks with Pakistan on the recommendations, one senior US official arrived in Islamabad on Saturday.

USAID chief Rajiv Shah has already met the Pakistani foreign minister and was scheduled to meet President Zardari for talks on US civilian assistance to Pakistan, indicating the US desire to stay engaged with Islamabad.

Mr Toner noted that in the past few weeks, senior US officials had held a series of meetings with Pakistani leaders, including President Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani, and said this was “reengaging already at a high level with Pakistani government. But nothing to announce in terms of next steps or upcoming trips or travels.”

Noting that the parliamentary process had not completed yet as the recommendations await cabinet’s approval, Mr Toner said: “As we move forward we definitely want to engage, to talk about the breadth of issues that have been raised in this parliamentary review and to come to a better understanding of our relationship.”

The US official pointed out that the two countries had stayed engaged throughout the process, including through “the turmoil, if you will, in the relationship post-November 26th.”

When pressed for comments on the recommendations, Mr Toner said he was not going to negotiate with Pakistan from the podium.

“Let our senior officials sit down with Pakistan's senior officials and discuss it,” he said. “We're aware of some of the concerns that parliamentary review raised. And frankly, some of them are not new to us, so we're gonna engage.”

The State Department official noted that “civilian, counter-terrorism and security cooperation” between the two countries had continued without interruption.

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...