NEW YORK, July 5: US officials have said that National Security Adviser Tom Donilon and Ambassador Sherry Rehman played a key role in breaking the deadlock between Pakistan and United States by arguing for a compromise settlement acceptable to both sides.

In an article on the process, the Wall Street Journal said on Thursday that a signal was conveyed when Mr Donilon appeared at a backyard barbecue hosted by Ambassador Sherry Rehman at her residence.

The paper quoted US officials as saying that his attendance was seen by the Pakistanis as a clear signal that the White House wanted to resolve the dispute and get the relationship back on track.

Ms Rehman had been shuttling between the State Department and the White House asking them to reach a compromise to move forward, the WSJ article said.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides consistently urged an apology for US mistakes in the name of improved relations, the WSJ said.

Officials also told the paper that the White House came to realise that there was no way that Islamabad, in an election year in Pakistan, could reopen the routes without an apology to calm the irate Pakistani public and the military’s rank and file.

US officials said the apology by Mrs Clinton also helped get the Pakistanis to drop demands for huge mark-ups in Nato payments for each cargo container transiting Pakistani territory.

Officials said the word “sorry” was the solution that was acceptable to the Pakistanis.

The White House balked at authorising Mrs Clinton to use the word “apologise.” US officials said some senior White House advisers were concerned such language could be used by Republicans to cast Mr Obama as an “apologiser-in-chief.”

The officials said the final language was far less than what Pakistani officials initially sought. Mrs Clinton stopped short of taking responsibility for the deaths. The Pentagon says Pakistan was party to blame for the incident. Besides, WSJ said, a Pakistani politician speculated that the Zardari government needed financial support from the US to move forward.

The US is expected to transfer more than $1 billion in frozen military aid, a first instalment on arrears that Islamabad says Washington owes.

By Tuesday, the standoff over the border crossings had become a symbol of Washington’s troubled relations with Pakistan, a country that since the Sept 11, 2001, attacks has become a sometimes difficult ally in the US war on terrorism.

More broadly, officials said they hoped the deal opening the border crossings would now clear the way for talks aimed at reaching a more sustainable joint approach to counter-terrorism.

US officials, the paper said, were concerned that Pakistani opposition would imperil a US campaign against Pakistan-based militants using armed Central Intelligence Agency-piloted drones.

In the past, the US and Pakistan shared intelligence and made lists of common militant targets, but that cooperation broke down over a series of controversial incidents beginning in early 2011.

Opinion

Editorial

Strange claim
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Strange claim

In all likelihood, Pakistan and US will continue to be ‘frenemies'.
Media strangulation
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Media strangulation

Administration must decide whether it wishes to be remembered as an enabler or an executioner of press freedom.
Israeli rampage
21 Dec, 2024

Israeli rampage

ALONG with the genocide in Gaza, Israel has embarked on a regional rampage, attacking Arab and Muslim states with...
Tax amendments
Updated 20 Dec, 2024

Tax amendments

Bureaucracy gimmicks have not produced results, will not do so in the future.
Cricket breakthrough
20 Dec, 2024

Cricket breakthrough

IT had been made clear to Pakistan that a Champions Trophy without India was not even a distant possibility, even if...
Troubled waters
20 Dec, 2024

Troubled waters

LURCHING from one crisis to the next, the Pakistani state has been consistent in failing its vulnerable citizens....