Prime Minister Raja Parvez Ashraf waving toward the party workers and media persons after a hearing at Supreme Court Case in the contempt of court case.   — Photo by Online

ISLAMABAD, Aug 27: Dressed in black sherwani on a sultry day, Raja Pervez Ashraf appeared before the Supreme Court on Monday as the second prime minister to answer why he should not be charged with committing contempt like his predecessor, but got a 22-day breathing space.

Prime Minister Ashraf appeared more confident than his predecessor Yousuf Raza Gilani and he quietly walked to the court, along with his visibly tense legal aide, Law Minister Farooq H. Naek, to be seated inside the courtroom No 2.

He was accompanied by his coalition partners like PML-Q’s Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, Awami National Party’s Haji Adeel, Muttahida Qaumi Movement’s Babar Ghouri and cabinet colleagues.

A five-judge bench headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa had issued a show-cause notice to the prime minister for not implementing its orders in the NRO case of writing a letter to the Swiss authorities to reopen graft cases worth $60 million against President Asif Zardari.

He was asked to appear before the court in person to answer contempt charges.

The white SUV carrying the prime minister was the same which had brought to the court premises his predecessor Gilani who was convicted and eventually disqualified for committing contempt of the court.

Throughout his presence, the court bristled with blue-clad security officers encircling the prime minister and by media personnel.

But the arrangement was better and the crowd more organised and relaxed than on previous occasions.

Request for time

The prime minister immediately clinched the opportunity when asked to address to the court. He spoke extempore in Urdu and right away asked for four to six weeks saying he had assumed the high office only two months ago and could not find adequate time to concentrate on the issue at hand because of daunting challenges the country was facing both domestically and internationally.

“Besides, I also wanted to submit a reply to the show-cause issued by the court and to engage a legal counsel,” the prime minister pleaded.

The performance of the prime minister was quite impressive and he got the much-needed space while not budging an inch from the government’s stance on the issue of writing the letter. The court also was more flexible towards him, said a legal observer who did not want to be named. It appeared that some kind of backchannel efforts were at work, he added.

“It is a matter of privilege and honour for me to appear before the highest court of the country,” Prime Minister Ashraf said. He conceded that the NRO implementation case had created quite an upheaval in the country and, therefore, needed to be resolved quickly.

No solid commitment

The prime minister avoided giving any clear assurance to the bench despite repeatedly asked to make a positive commitment. He said it was his solemn desire to find a way out commensurate with the dignity and honour of the judiciary.

“I am a law-abiding citizen and have complete respect for the law and the judiciary. I don’t want to give an impression as if my government intends to defy a court order,” he said, adding that he wanted to create an example that the PPP government respected the judiciary.

“It is my as well as my coalition partners’ strong desire not to be remembered in history as someone who flouted and disregarded the dignity and majesty of the court,” Mr Ashraf emphasised.

He said he would make sincere efforts to end the current uncertainty which was taking a heavy toll on the country and expressed his resolve again to find an amicable solution to the stalemate, keeping in view the dignity of the court.

“But I need time to reach a consensus with the coalition partners as well as cabinet colleagues,” he said.

No turning back

Justice Asif Khosa praised the prime minister for appearing before the court and said that until indicted he should not consider himself to be an accused since the court had great respect and deference for the high office. But he made it clear that after the judgment in the Gilani conviction case it was difficult for the court to go back from its stance on NRO implementation or for the prime minister to have any discretion in the matter.

“Only implementation of court’s order will reflect respect for the judiciary and not mere appearance before it,” Justice Khosa observed.

“The matter can be solved in three days as all you have to do, as explained in the Gilani case, is to authorise either the law minister or Attorney General Irfan Qadir and the court will sort out the rest of the matter,” the bench assured the prime minister and reiterated its earlier offer to facilitate the government by addressing all concerns it had with the court.

“We will also take care of any anticipated effect,” the court observed.

The prime minister said the media had created a lot of hype which was adversely affecting “our relations with the outside world, especially with the United States and, therefore, it should be solved at all cost”.

“I assure you that it is not my intention to linger on the matter any further,” he said. But he ignored repeated remarks by judges about contemptuous statements being made by certain senators, governors and ministers against the judiciary. All that the prime minister had to say was to mention the drubbing he and the president were getting at the hands of 89 independent TV channels.

The order

After a brief consultation with brother judges, Justice Khosa acceded to put off the proceedings till Sept 18, but pointed out that the prime minister had undertaken to appear in person again on that date.

The order said he (prime minister) had stated his earnest and sincere desire to resolve the present issue in a manner which would uphold the dignity of the court and also address the concerns of the federal government.

“With these submissions he has requested for some time to make a genuine and sincere effort to first understand the issue with all its complexities and then take steps to implement the order/direction of this court,” the order said.

After the hearing, the attorney general said the prime minister’s appearance before the court showed his respect for the judiciary. The judiciary also should reciprocate the same, he said.

Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira said the prime minister’s presence had proved that all those who were accusing the ruling PPP of not complying with the court’s orders were wrong. He said some positive way out would emerge after consultation with coalition partners.

Opinion

Editorial

Tribunals’ failure
Updated 19 Nov, 2024

Tribunals’ failure

With election tribunals having failed to fulfil their purpose, it isn't surprising that Pakistan has not been able to stabilise.
Balochistan MPC
19 Nov, 2024

Balochistan MPC

WHILE immediate threats to law and order must be confronted by security forces, the long-term solution to...
Firm tax measures
19 Nov, 2024

Firm tax measures

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is ready to employ force to make everyone and every sector in Pakistan pay their...
When medicine fails
Updated 18 Nov, 2024

When medicine fails

Between now and 2050, medical experts expect antibiotic resistance to kill 40m people worldwide.
Nawaz on India
Updated 18 Nov, 2024

Nawaz on India

Nawaz Sharif’s hopes of better ties with India can only be realised when New Delhi responds to Pakistan positively.
State of abuse
18 Nov, 2024

State of abuse

The state must accept that crimes against children have become endemic in the country.