LHC orders production of Khwajas

Published December 28, 2002

LAHORE, Dec 27: The Lahore High Court on Friday ordered the production of Dr Javed Khwaja’s three family members before it on Dec 31, reportedly being interrogated by a federal investigation agency.

Justice M. Javed Buttar issued these directions to the state with an observation that the Deputy Attorney General (DAG) had failed to produce any order before the court showing the detention or arrest of Dr Umar Karar, Dr Khizar Ali and Muhammad Usman by a federal agency on allegations of being involved in anti-state activities.

DAG Malik Pervez Akhtar, while appearing on behalf of the state, produced para-wise comments to the petition filed by Amtal Khwaja against the arrest of her family members from her residence in Manawan last week. The state reiterated the plea that one of the federal investigation agencies was interrogating the three for being the foreign nationals conspiring against the country.

Once again, the name of the federal investigation agency interrogating the three accused could not be disclosed by the state counsel, seeking further time to come up with more information.

When the court showed its intentions for passing orders for the detainees’ production on Dec 31, the DAG requested for a longer adjournment. But the court disallowed the request, saying had he shown any detention order, he would have been given more time.

In a written reply to the petition, the state disclosed that the raid had been conducted for arresting such Pakistani and “foreign” nationals as were suspected to be involved in anti-state activities.

While responding to a prayer of the petitioner, the state, in its comments, offered to produce the detainees before the court for satisfying it regarding the legality of their arrest.

The allegation that neither grounds of arrest of the accused were furnished nor search warrants shown during the raid conducted at their residence last week, was refuted with a claim that such arrests were necessary for the security of the country.

According to the state, there was nothing objectionable in conducting a raid on elements working against the country’s security and maintaining ties with terrorists.

It was claimed that search of the house was necessary for the recovery of “corroboratory evidence” and it was not illegal. The state vehemently opposed the petitioner’s argument that Article 9 and 10 of the Constitution regarding the human liberty had been violated as a result of Dr Khwaja and family members’ arrest.

The petitioners’ counsel Hamid Khan requested the court to further issue orders for allowing the family members of the three detainees to meet them.

Opinion

Editorial

Truant ministers
Updated 14 Dec, 2024

Truant ministers

LAWMAKERS from both the opposition and treasury benches have been up in arms about what they see as cabinet...
Engaging with Kabul
14 Dec, 2024

Engaging with Kabul

WHILE relations with the Afghan Taliban have been testy of late, mainly because of the feeling in Islamabad that the...
Half measures
Updated 14 Dec, 2024

Half measures

The question remains: Were suspects' prolonged detention, subsequent trial, and punishments ever legal in eyes of the law?
A political resolution
Updated 13 Dec, 2024

A political resolution

It seems that there has been some belated realisation that a power vacuum has been created at expense of civilian leadership.
High price increases
13 Dec, 2024

High price increases

FISCAL stabilisation prescribed by the IMF can be expensive — for the common people — in more ways than one. ...
Beyond HOTA
13 Dec, 2024

Beyond HOTA

IN a welcome demonstration of HOTA’s oversight role, kidney transplant services have been suspended at...