A view of the Gwadar port. — Photo by AFP
A view of the Gwadar port. — Photo by AFP

QUETTA: The Balochistan government has said that ports and shipping are the subjects handled by the federal government and the provincial government has no role in the award of Gwadar Port contract to China.

In a statement issued here late on Friday night, a spokesperson for the Balochistan government termed the criticism of the provincial government for the award of the contract to China unjustified.

He rejected objections raised by some quarters over the role of provincial government on the issue, saying constitutionally the federal government was responsible for taking any decision about ports and shipping.

The spokesperson said Gwadar Port was completed in 2007 at a cost of $287.8 million by a Chinese company and the contract for handling of the port was awarded to a Singaporean company by the then government of Gen Pervez Musharraf.

He said one of the objectives for constructing the port was to create jobs. Under the agreement, the Chinese company would set up a free economic zone in Gwadar which would promote trade and industrial activities, besides connecting Gwadar to other parts of the country.

He said Gwadar Port is an asset of the people of Balochistan, which would strengthen provincial economy.

The spokesperson referred to a statement of Governor Nawab Zulfiqar Magsi in which he said on the eve of the signing of the contract that benefits of Gwadar Port should first be given to the people of Balochistan.

He said experts had expressed apprehensions that if Gwadar Port was not made fully operational its machinery would become unusable. After the construction of three births only 4 million tons of fertiliser and about one million ton of wheat had been imported through the port which was not enough to make it fully operational, he added.

Referring to Reko Diq project, the spokesperson said the previous provincial government took it back from Tethyan Copper Company to run it by itself. The TCC filed a case in the ICC ICA and ICSID, London, against the decision. However, both forums allowed the Balochistan government to continue running the project.

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...
Kurram ceasefire
Updated 26 Nov, 2024

Kurram ceasefire

DESPITE efforts by the KP government to bring about a ceasefire in Kurram tribal district, the bloodletting has...
Hollow victory
26 Nov, 2024

Hollow victory

THE conclusion of COP29 in Baku has left developing nations — struggling with the mounting costs of climate...
Infrastructure schemes
26 Nov, 2024

Infrastructure schemes

THE government’s decision to finance priority PSDP schemes on a three-year rolling basis is a significant step...