Former President Pervez Musharraf and his wife Sehba Musharraf.—File Photo

ISLAMABAD The Supreme Court was requested on Monday to overturn its judgment validating the Nov 3, 2007, emergency rule in the Tikka Iqbal Mohammad case and order placing the name of former president Pervez Musharraf on the exit control list (ECL) by booking him in a treason case for abrogating the Constitution and damaging the judiciary.

Advocate Fazal Ellahi Siddiqui, who moved the petition under the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court on fundamental rights, also accuses former chief justice Abdul Hameed Dogar and 43 other judges of aiding and abetting the subversion of the Constitution by taking oath under the Provisional Constitution Order (PCO) after the proclamation of Nov 3 emergency.

This is the third such petition filed in the apex court after reinstatement of Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry. In earlier petitions, Advocate Nadeem Malik and Advocate Nadeem Ahmed sought that contempt of court proceedings be initiated against the judges who took oath under the PCO and the verdict in the Tikka Iqbal case be declared null and void.

Former president Musharraf, President Asif Ali Zardari, the army chief, former chief justice Dogar and Justice (retd) Mohammad Nawaz Abbasi are respondents in Advcate Ellahi's petition.

The petition said it had become a common phenomenon that the army intervened after every eight to 10 years, amended the Constitution to suit its needs and eventually to get its acts of omissions and commissions validated by the courts and parliament.

'The military commanders consider that the public will weep and wail for a few days (on military intervention), but after that they have to reconcile to the fait accompli,' the petition said.

The Americans, like in Musharraf's time, have also been given a free hand by President Zardari and fundamental rights of the people are being violated daily in tribal areas and Dir, Swat and Chitral. A large number of people have migrated from these areas and suffered tremendous losses with no hope of returning to their homes because of US drone attacks, but the government is sitting as a silent spectator.'

The petition contended that the act of former president Musharraf to wrest powers of the judiciary was indeed an act of high treason to serve US and British interests.

It said that the judges who had taken oath under the PCO had also committed the grave crime of subverting the Constitution and, therefore, deserved to be dealt with under Article 6 (high treason) of the Constitution and punished under Section 2 of Act No LXVIII of 1973 as High Treason (Punishment) Act of 1973.

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...
Kurram ceasefire
Updated 26 Nov, 2024

Kurram ceasefire

DESPITE efforts by the KP government to bring about a ceasefire in Kurram tribal district, the bloodletting has...
Hollow victory
26 Nov, 2024

Hollow victory

THE conclusion of COP29 in Baku has left developing nations — struggling with the mounting costs of climate...
Infrastructure schemes
26 Nov, 2024

Infrastructure schemes

THE government’s decision to finance priority PSDP schemes on a three-year rolling basis is a significant step...