Sports Day at the Army Public School, Peshawar from the yearbook for the academic year 1999-2000. —Photo by author
Grief
What are the boundaries of grief?
In time, does it start right away, or does it take a couple of days for the shock to settle in and then be replaced by grief?
Maybe it starts earlier for some and later for others. Of course, it never happens for most. Because in space, the boundaries of grief are quite ambiguous.
Humanity never grieves in its entirety. “There are so many children beneath the benches, go and get them”, one of them shouted.
Will he, with the big black boots, ever grieve this?
What do we grieve for? Deaths, the deaths of children? At what number does grief begin? 141 dead, 132 of them children, they report. When was the last time you grieved? What was the number then? Do we need more than numbers to grieve? Pictures, details of how it happened?
Over the years, the bodies have accumulated. From tens to hundreds to thousands to tens of thousands. We have not grieved them enough. The world has grieved them even less.
Which is the bigger atrocity? The millions who grieve or the billions who will never grieve?
It is impossible to grieve every single time. For every single one. It is impossible to grieve for too long.
Blame and Condemnation
The one with the big black boots says he did this because of what others with big black boots did to him. In apportioning blame, how far back in history do we go and how wide do we cast our net?
We know that if we cast it too wide, it will capture us or those close to us or those we do not want to be seen disagreeing with.
And so we start off cautiously, taking one incident at a time, trying to trace the path between cause and effect. When we do go beyond single incidents, we go for neat, comfortable narratives.
Russian invasion in Afghanistan. American funding of Mujahideen. The Army’s games in Afghanistan and Kashmir. Indian infiltration. Saudi money. Poverty. Lack of education. Lack of development. Apathetic politicians. Insensitive middle classes.
If X causes Y and Y causes Z, can we blame Y for Z or is only X to blame? Where do we start and where do we stop?
Perhaps monsters are created because we need a visualisation of the evil that our minds cannot capture. Monsters are useful because they distance blame from ourselves. Monsters are simple, neat and horrific. There is no need for nuance. Evil is useful because if evil exists then good does too, and we embody the good because we define the evil.
The condemnations come pouring in.
COAS Raheel Sharif. Chairman PTI Imran Khan. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Prime Minister David Cameron. Ambassador Richard Olson. President Obama. Secretary General Ban Ki Moon.
Each with their own idea of good and evil, of the nature of the beast. Each outside the circle of blame, within the circle of grief.
“Our resolve has taken new height. Will continue (to) go after inhuman beasts, their facilitators till their final elimination,” says COAS Raheel Sharif.
Who is this beast, where and when does it begin, and where do we need to go to eliminate it?
Is it within our borders or outside them as well?
Does it end where we begin or does it extend to within our souls?
Is there someone else left to blame, before we finally turn on ourselves?
Mourning
The Chief Minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa declared three days of mourning.
Now, we will mourn for three days. And then, we will stop mourning.
We forget our own 9/11’s (there have been too many). How can we expect anyone else to remember?