‘Ay there is the rub’
This year has seen so much cricket that it is feared the common fan’s appetite for the game may have sickened and died. Over the course of 24 hours there is either live or recorded cricket of all sorts being screened by various channels.
We have had all the 10 permanent members (Test playing countries) in action as ever-improving, as well as the associate members like Afghanistan and Ireland besides others like Namibia, Papua New Guinea, Netherlands, UAE… I could go on and on but I am sure you have formed an idea of what has been going on in the cricketing world. There have been Test matches, ODIs, as well as Twenty/20s. We have had ICC tournaments for under-19 players. Not to be left behind the women have had a fairly busy year, and the blind cricketers have been kept quite busy. All these, be they bilateral or multilateral, come under the aegis of the ICC.
However, there is another type emerging whose status to me is nebulous. These are the bashes, and the leagues.
Some are domestic like the Indian Premier League (IPL), the Bangladesh Premier League (BPL), the Sri Lankan League, the Caribbean League, the Australian Big Bash and the cross Atlantic Warne-Tendulkar League. There may be others which slip my mind at the moment. Although these are national (except for the last named), the ICC does seem to have a handle on them as well.
What is the ICC’s role in these, I am not sure and as such will only leave this by saying that ICC generally oversees these and ensures there is no foul play in these games. ICC does allow its officials, umpires and referees to supervise the proceedings, and the rules of the games applicable to ICC events are normally applied to these as well.
For some years, Pakistan had also been toying with the idea of having its own league, which they named Pakistan Super League (PSL). To put it briefly the PCB started with a bang some years ago, and of course since our cricket home is ‘UAE’, it was suggested that it be held there. Money was pumped in, so-called experts like a former CEO of ICC and a former senior banker were inducted into the team. But with in-house problems of the PCB, the idea fell through or to be more precise the event was postponed sine die. It lay dormant I suppose for some time while the PCB changed chairmen as frequently as someone changes shirts on a sweltering summer’s day.
At last the PSL is on, but are we on safe ground yet?
With the arrival of the dynamic and progressive Najam Sethi after the Zaka Ashraf fiasco was put to bed, things took a different turn. Najam Sethi and Shahryar Khan first flip flopped as chairmen and after another round of musical chairs it was settled that Shahryar would be the chairman of the PCB while Najam would be the chief of the all powerful Executive Committee. The PSL idea was revived by Sethi, who ruled that the event would be held off shore in the UAE. This was opposed and in fact refuted by Khan, but even before he had finished uttering these words he recanted and made his now familiar U-turn.
I must add that during the last year and a half, the PCB has had its hands full of problems mostly of its own creation, such as trying to bend backwards to woo India to play a ‘home’ series, which was enshrined in an MOU. It was worth 20 million dollars — at least that is what we are told. That was not to be. It was conjectured at that time that the PSL’s birth depended on the staging of the series against India.
Apart from this major ‘disaster’ for PCB, there were other niggling problems like the case of Mohammad Amir (and Mohammad Asif and Salman Butt; and some ask why not of Danish Kaneria??). As if this was not enough, Yasir Shah, the kingpin of the Pakistan bowling, was sidelined on a doping charge. For the PCB chairman it does not rain, it pours.
There was also a ‘home’ series to be arranged in UAE against England and the results were a far cry from what they were the last time; tours were taken for the World Cup, and for bilateral contests against Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe and New Zealand. Then there were the under-19; ‘A’ Team’s trips and above all, the all important Quaid-e-Azam Trophy followed by the shorter format domestic tournament. The quest for Indian dollars and the arrangements for ‘the jewel in the crown’ PSL had absorbed the energies and efforts of the already bloated but laid-back staff and managers of the PCB; thus little attention was given to matters aforementioned.
The results of the matches played by the senior team were far from satisfactory; though the juniors did much better.
Unfortunately, the arrangements for the domestic events yet again left much to be desired, due to neglect and attention to detail. These were held at the wrong time without taking into account the calendar, other cricket engagements, and weather conditions. This resulted in the arrangements coming across as shabby and shoddy. PCB also allowed some important players to go and play in the BPL and other leagues while some others were on national duty. It seems that our international cricket is being kept afloat in spite of our domestic cricket, rather than because of it.
Not to be deterred by such ‘minor’ setbacks, Sethi went ahead like the proverbial “soldiers marching as to war…” and completed the structure of the PSL, overcoming obstacles by holding it in Qatar or UAE. By the time this piece sees the light of day the PSL would be three days into the event in Dubai and Sharjah.
I must confess that that I am clueless about the ‘drafting’ or the categories of the players of PSL but I am sure those giving and receiving the remunerations know the calculations. There are certain “drafts” which remain a mystery — such as why the Quetta Gladiators (who had second bite of the peach after Islamabad had been “cajoled” not to bid for Shahid Afridi) not go for the prime crowd puller the charismatic all rounder and the former Pakistan captain in all formats? Or why was the Pakistan one day captain Azhar Ali “squeezed in” as a last-minute thought for Lahore. Arguably one of the least paid of the squad, he is now their captain (compare his fee with that of Chris Gayle). I also fail to comprehend the meaning of “emerging” players.
The broadcasting rights and TV rights have been worked out differently from what the PCB does. To some it makes no sense; to me I do not care. The production teams and technical crew would (as usual) be non Pakistanis, perhaps mostly Indians. By the way, just to correct the impression of those who think Ten Sports (PCB’s ‘lifelong partner’) is a Dubai company, let me tell you that it hardly has any presence in the UAE. It is an Indian company based in NOIDA (New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, which is a short distance from New Delhi).
While still on the subject of TV and radio, I am informed that the radio commentary will be in English and Urdu (fair enough) with our Chief Selector Haroon Rashid on the panel; I hope this information is incorrect as Haroon would never let his interests clash. However, it seems that the TV commentary will be in English. Pakistan’s inaugural Super League should have been in Urdu (and English) and we have enough talent to do the job. There were days when Radio Pakistan and PTV used to cover all Pakistan matches (cricket and hockey) and ICC events by sending their commentary teams so that the Pakistani audience could get the Pakistani flavoured version of the proceedings. Wake up chairmen PTV and PBC (Radio Pakistan)!
If we have five teams, each should have had a Pakistani icon (their fee was 15 per cent more than the highest paid player auctioned) — maybe chosen from Misbahul Haq, Younis Khan, Shahid Afridi, Mohammad Hafeez, Saeed Ajmal, Shoaib Malik. Just as a reminder, if my memory serves me right the icons of the first IPL were Indian greats Sachin Tendulkar, Saurav Ganguly, Yuvraj Singh, Vengipuruppu Venkatsai Laxman, Rahul Dravid and Virender Sehwag.
It must be noted that Laxman withdrew from accepting that status so that the money thus saved could be used to buy some other players for his team the Deccan Chargers. It is ironic that Younis Khan and Saeed Ajmal, two of the top performers for Pakistan in recent years have no role in the PSL — imagine a Pakistan cricket ‘Who is Who’ without the names of Hanif Mohammad and Fazal Mahmood. The mentors, managers, head coaches and other support staff should have been mainly Pakistanis.