Villagers gathers to bid Sharif goodbye. —Photo by Syed Owais Ali
This documentary is essential in broadening the narrative because it tackles two main misconceptions that are common to the discourse on migrant issues:
The perils of pride
The first misconception is that the migrants are simply unaware of the true nature of working abroad, especially in certain countries where migrants are not treated well, and so they ignorantly find themselves trapped in their host countries.
Sharif’s story, however, reveals that he is well aware of the perils of being a migrant worker in the UAE through his friend who already works there.
Can we then go on merely prescribing “raising awareness” as the silver bullet to this issue, or is it time to realise the failures of state and society that result in the socio-economic circumstances which compel those on the fringes to migrate?
Also read: 'I'd rather die than be sent to Turkey' — Why Pakistani migrants prefer Greece's hellish camps
Even filmmaker Owais — someone who has grown up in the UAE and has had frequent interactions with migrant workers — claims in his author’s note that he found it surprising that this level of awareness was present in the village, and yet, it was collectively decided to send Sharif abroad.
Though intuitive, this revelation leads to the larger argument that migrant workers should not be treated as irrational agents who are simply dazzled by the prospects of higher earnings abroad and migrate in search for it, while unaware of the troubles that lie ahead for them.
It is easy to dismiss the poor as simply cattle that flock towards any source of income because that is seemingly their only goal.
In fact, migrants, similar to subjects of other social justice and public policy issues, must be regarded as rational actors, who undergo a process of a detailed cost-benefit analysis before making choices, but are faced with dire circumstances that often force their hand.
The debt of migration
The second major contribution of this documentary is that it captures a vicious poverty trap that is at work.
Sharif and his village live in poverty, such that they farm for a living, and make enough out of it to sustain themselves and own a small car for the whole village for emergency needs.
However, poor crop yields because of infrastructural issues force the village elders to decide that Sharif must go abroad to help provide for everyone.
After a few torrid months abroad, Sharif ultimately returns home, which results in his father having to sell his hard-earned property and the village having to sell the car to finance the debt of migration.
Not to forget, we are talking about people who can only afford one roti as a meal. Hence, even Sharif’s elderly mother, who pretends to be glad to have her son back, states with desperation that how can she truly be happy with his return when they are now so much more worse off.
Counter-factually, even if Sharif managed to stick to the plan and work abroad for a few years, there is little hope that he would have acted as a catalyst, as had been expected, to the village’s development.
In fact, most migrants find themselves trapped in a debt cycle, something this documentary does not focus on, that results from the presence of loan sharks in villages to finance the migratory process.