If you subscribe to the morbid tune of the naysayers, Test cricket currently has a future bleaker than those locked up in Guantanamo Bay. The game goes too long. No one is watching it. There’s more money in T20. You have heard it all. You suspect that some of it holds true. No shame in that.
But beware. Believe in the Pravda-written propaganda if you wish. But this is Test cricket, and it’s Test cricket that is the maker of cricketing gods. Not one-day cricket. Not T20. And it is this same Test cricket that in 2016 has decided that enough is enough. It has stared down the Kraken and refused to accept that any mythical monster, no matter how big, will stop its climb back into the consciousness of the people.
The more astute had an inkling that the renaissance was happening.
In 2016 Test cricket has found its own way to fashion a resurgence against the glitz and glam of the shorter formats which had people writing it off as dead. It upped its excitement levels
Early in the year, the ICC floated a plan to bring context to Test cricket with some kind of two-tier system. This aimed to increase the amount of teams playing and would create a promotion and relegation system, creating a forced sense of meaning. Rightly, this idea was shot down like a Russian plane flying over American airspace. Although an unpopular outcome with cricket’s hipsters, the two-tier system was unfortunately the right sentiment wrapped in the pastry of the wrong mechanism. Essentially, the ICC wanted to increase the amount of teams playing Test cricket. Perhaps new countries could join in the party. Perhaps the ICC could find better ways to make TV networks more likely to buy the rights to the matches.
The ICC are now looking at a two conference system, with finals potentially played every second year. A much better system and one that doesn’t create a rich division and a poor division.
Quietly in the background, Ireland have achieved First Class status for their domestic four-day competition. This is important, as it means that not only do Ireland stand a better chance of keeping its local talent rather than losing it to England, but it also brings the country one step closer to full membership. Under current ICC rules, this is required should one wish to participate in the Test circuit.
Important changes these may be. Required they are. But structural changes are unlikely to win over the hearts, minds and coffee conversations of any but the most die-hard cricket fans.
To the ICC’s credit, you don’t look at ways to grow the game like this if you want the game to disappear.
But apart from the administrative changes, Test cricket has found its own ways to fight back. It has decided that the pace of structural change is too slow.
It has worked out that if Test cricket is to once again be the pinnacle, then it needs to go back to the glory days. Back to when Test matches produced better scripts than any Spielberg movie. Back to the days when the best actors seen on your screen were Imran, Hadlee, Kapil, Border and Ambrose. Not Shah Rukh Khan or Brad Pitt. Back to the days when sporting romance was an integral part of daily life. Back when it was the heartbeat of society.
In 2016, Test cricket has given us these elements. It has reminded us that class and elegance is always a better partner than flashiness and short-termism.
It began with Pakistan threatening to become the number one Test team in the world. A feat it had only achieved once before. A feat so unlikely given everything working against them that it could be argued that there has never been a bigger global sporting story. It is hard to think of any other team in the world that has reached the number one ranking without having the ability to play at home.
All that was needed was for Australia to lose 3-0 to a Sri Lankan team in disarray, India to clean-sweep a broken West Indies and for Pakistan to at least draw a series in England. Bookies were letting punters write their own ticket on this outcome happening.