The lush greenery of the park from the days of its beginning (left) is nowhere to be seen now.—White Star
According to a former senior KMC official, there are a number of problematic issues in the attempted “handing over” of Bagh Ibne Qasim to Bahria Town.
Firstly, neither the Sindh government nor KMC have any claim to the ownership of the park. When a land authority develops a housing scheme, it recovers its costs from the sale of plots through occupancy value and development charges. These costs, in the present instance, would have included the amount that KDA had to pay for the land to the Board of Revenue, Sindh and the cost of infrastructure development, ie roads, water supply, sewage disposal and development of amenities including parks, playgrounds, schools, mosques, etc.
The park thus belongs to the residents of KDA Scheme 5 where it is located, with KMC responsible for its maintenance and further development. Even the 309-member KMC council cannot vote to have the ownership of the park changed without inviting objections and seeking permission from the area residents.
Secondly, in its March 30 notification, the provincial government claimed that Bagh Ibne Qasim had been “taken over by its Local Government Department from KMC” before it was handed over for adoption to Bahria Town. According to the Rules of Business, 1986 as amended in 2002, the role of the Sindh Local Government Department (SLGD) is to coordinate, supervise and monitor the functioning of local departments/councils. None of the rules provide for SLGD to act as an agency that can undertake execution of development works on its own.
Thirdly, while the Section 74 of Sindh Local Government Act 2013 allows for the government to “take over the management and control of any institution or service maintained by a Council” — in this case KMC — it only allows transfer of such management and control to another council, not to a private party.
The ruling PPP clearly attaches no significance to what are not only legal niceties but also its moral obligations to the people of the city. Neither apparently, does the local government, notwithstanding its recent show of protest. Both are complicit in the ongoing commercialisation of the city’s major parks.
This is being facilitated by a thus far little-known Sindh government notification dated Nov 21, 2016 which distorts the above-mentioned Section 74 to authorise SLGD to “take over” any public parks or gardens from the KMC and assign their maintenance to any company or multinational. Including Bagh Ibne Qasim, five parks in the city — the others being Benazir Bhutto Park, Frere Gardens, Beach Park and Jehangir Park — have been or are in process of being handed over to commercial interests.
On Dec 23, 2016, the government of Sindh issued a notification declaring the takeover of Benazir Bhutto Park by SLGD. It is also believed that that the powers that be in the province have decided to hand over Frere Gardens to the organiser of an annual food festival on the premises, while Beach Park and Jehangir Park are also being gifted to commercial interests in a similarly questionable manner.
The Supreme Court and Sindh High Court orders in several cases have held the commercialisation of public parks and amenities to be a violation of the law and citizens’ rights.
Bahria’s Town’s footprint
Notwithstanding these court judgements, the iconic Bagh Ibne Qasim is being slowly devoured by Bahria Icon Tower with the full knowledge of the provincial government and KMC, well before the Sindh government decided to make the process ‘official’.
A senior land official, now retired, questioned the blatantly preferential treatment that KMC has meted out to Bahria. As per KMC rules, he said, Bahria’s bid for the Rs1,73,25,000 maintenance contract was accompanied by a pay order of five per cent of the value, which came to roughly Rs 850,000. “But although Bahria did not even attempt to maintain the park, KMC has still not encashed the bid bond submitted by the developer,” he disclosed. “Neither has it taken any of the actions that one would have expected it to take. It didn’t cancel the contract or blacklist the firm or levy the Rs1,000 per day penalty stipulated in the contract. It didn’t even invite new tenders. Instead, it gave the park for adoption to the same party!”