Screenshot of MAK's Facebook profile page.
"What I used to do was that I would purchase shares of a company and announce that I had made an investment. I also posted about both positive and negative aspects of my investment," he told Dawn.com.
"When I had recommended investment in GAIL shares, the value of its share was Rs10. It now stands at Rs19," he said. [GAIL closed on May 9 at Rs15.39; we spoke to MAK later the same day].
"What loss did I inflict on investors," he asked.
"I have a fan following in the millions and I have taught thousands of people on stocks, but not a single investor has filed any report against me," he added.
What are the laws that the SECP believes MAK is guilty of violating? Read them here.
No stranger to controversy
This is not the first time MAK has found himself in the middle of a legal storm.
In 2014, business journalist and entrepreneur Baqar Abbas Jafri had sent out a mass email to financial institutions and investors pointing to MAK's messy 'history'.
Jafri explained to Dawn.com that he had been approached by MAK in 2011 with assurances that the latter would help the former arrange a Dubai-based investor for Jafri's startup.
However, instead of getting him funding, Jafri said MAK stole the expanded vision for the company and claimed it as his own.
In the second paragraph of that email — sent to individuals associated in various capacities with financial markets — Jafri had said: "I would like to inform you all that I have been a victim to a fraud done by US Fugitive [sic] from Wall Street."
"After realising the extent of the fraud that is being hatched against me, and [the] history of the person involved, I relinquished everything and disassociated myself from the company," Jafri wrote.
"He has usurped all my concept and workings, and portrayed me as [an] employee [of the company only]. Now, after realising that his fraud is exposed, he is portraying me as a former employee (CEO) fired by the company," Jafri said.
MAK had proceeded to file a case against Jafri and his team for theft of intellectual property and even managed to have him arrested.
However, the court which was to hear the case shelved it in October 2016 citing lack of sufficient evidence provided by MAK's legal team and cleared the accused of the charges brought against them.
The court had said the case could still go to trial if MAK brought forth additional evidence to support his allegations. There seem to have been no significant developments so far.
The fugitive from Wall Street
There was a reason Jafri brought up MAK's history to demonstrate his own innocence.
"Mr Khan is a fugitive from justice in New York, where state prosecutors accused him last spring of stealing millions of dollars from several of his brokerage firm's customers — including some who also happened to be members of the Gambino organised crime family," American financial journalist Diana B. Henriques wrote in The New York Times in January 2000.
She had stumbled across a "glowing profile of a young Karachi-born financial entrepreneur named Mohammad Ali Khan, who had returned to invest in his native land after 'a highly successful career' in New York."
"'As the youngest chairman and founder of an investment bank in America,'" Henriques quoted from the profile, "'his accomplishments are a little more than extraordinary.'"
"Well, in a way, perhaps they are," she added, wryly.
"The Gambino customers, one of whom is in federal prison, have expressed their annoyance by filing a lawsuit against the absent financier and one of his top brokers," Henriques wrote.
Her story said US prosecutors, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the New York state attorney's office had filed separate lawsuits against Khan in 1999 on charges of grand larceny and committing securities fraud.
We found a litigation release from the US SEC, dated May 17, 1999, in which the regulator wrote: "Khan, who controls KMS [Klein Maus & Shire Inc] and USFG [The United States Financial Group, Inc], and Kohli, Khan's brother-in-law, engaged in two fraudulent offerings of unregistered securities."
"First, between April 1996 and June 1997, KMS, Khan and Kohli fraudulently obtained at least $2.7 million from at least 55 purchasers of KMS securities by making false and misleading statements about KMS' business operations and by overstating its financial condition.
"Second, in offering for sale securities of USFG, KMS' parent company, from July 1997 through January 1998, USFG, Khan and Kohli made material misrepresentations concerning the financial condition of USFG. For example, Khan and Kohli, directly or indirectly, distributed financial statements for KMS and USFG that overstated each company's assets by more than 20-fold and 200-fold, respectively.
"During the course of the offerings of the KMS and USFG securities, Khan and Kohli diverted and dissipated for their personal benefit sums totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars. By March 17, 1999, KMS had exhausted its capital and closed its doors.
"Khan and KMS also: (a) unlawfully offered and sold KMS securities without filing a registration statement and when no exemption was available; (b) unlawfully employed an unregistered salesman to sell the KMS securities and took steps to conceal that activity; and (c) failed to comply with the penny stock disclosure requirements in connection with the sale of the KMS securities," the SEC wrote.
The full text of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's litigation release can be read here.
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan had also filed a criminal complaint against Khan, Henriques reported, accusing him of committing securities fraud by using lies and exaggerations to entice at least 55 people to invest nearly $3 million in his brokerage firm.
'I was targeted for being Muslim'
When asked by Dawn.com about the outstanding criminal investigations against him in the United States, MAK said: "I was the first Muslim who opened a bank in the US, so they [US authorities] behaved with me the same way they treated Agha Hassan Abedi of the Bank of Credit & Commerce International."
Rejecting all allegations levelled against him in The New York Times and other publications, MAK asked: "Why did they not declare me an absconder and convict me in the last 17 years."
"Why were they unable to convict me even when I was unable to defend myself in US courts," he added.
This sense of victimisation reflects in MAK's public relations offensive following the SECP announcement.
He has also invoked religion and projected himself as a 'family guy' while attempting to tap into his followers' sympathies following the personally damaging announcement.
Commenting on why the SECP has decided to act against him in the following video, he says: "I write against what is wrong, maybe because of that; maybe because I speak the truth. Maybe because I have shut down a lot of people operating in capital markets by giving away free advice."
On the other hand, the SECP seems to believe they have the right man.
Confident of the case they have built, the SECP filed criminal charges against MAK in a court on May 9, 2017.
"MAK’s strategy is in violation of Sections 134 and 136 of the Securities Act, 2015 and accordingly penal provisions of Section 159 of the Securities Act, 2015 are proposed to be invoked against him," the regulator said in a press release posted to its website.
"He had been pinpointed. We have all the relevant records with us," Sajid Gondal told Dawn.com. "We have modern trading software that can detect and flag irregular trading patterns, which was used extensively in this case."
Gondal told Dawn.com that the SECP is aware of MAK's 'history' and has approached the Federal Investigation Agency to place him on the Exit Control List so that he does not flee the country.
The MAK case is the latest example of the SECP's robustness in dealing with securities-related crimes, Gondal said.
"We have been working with courts to apprise them of financial crimes and cases of securities fraud and have been getting a very positive response," he said.
If the court finds MAK guilty, he will face three years in jail on top of penalties, Gondal said.
"The penalties we will seek won't just include the return of the wrongful gains made by him, but also additional fines, which may run into the tens of millions of rupees," he said.
"We are confident we will secure a conviction."