Kulsoom Nawaz hugs her daughter Maryam Nawaz before she departs for the JIT secretariat. ─ DawnNews
The former are adamant that it is an "egoistic decision" to summon the PM's daughter for questioning, whereas the latter hold that it is the Sharif family itself which is responsible for the JIT's summons.
Maryam, however, expressed her resolve to face investigators in a series of timely messages sent from her Twitter account on Tuesday night.
"He has seen [and] been through the most testing times, in the 30-plus years of his political career… yet as an affectionate [and] protective father, I saw his eyes filled with concern and apprehensions over his daughter’s appearance before JIT," she tweeted.
"I told him that I am your daughter, trained by you, [and] will neither cower down, nor yield to pressure [and] nothing will deter me from taking up the cudgels against transgression and injustice. Will appear before the JIT, follow the rule of law as you always have," Maryam tweeted, before concluding on a positive note: "See you tomorrow, Insha’Allah."
Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, like other PML-N leaders, has strongly objected to his niece Maryam's summoning by the JIT.
"There is no moral justification for the JIT decision to summon the daughter of the prime minister," he said in a statement issued earlier on Tuesday.
"We accept the JIT’s privilege to summon any person as witness but our civilisation teaches us respect for women," he added.
PTI's Fawad Chaudhry, while speaking to reporters in Islamabad today, claimed that the party was not to be blamed for the summons to Maryam Nawaz.
"These people talk about how three generations of their family are being held accountable. However, we had only nominated Nawaz Sharif in our petition and everyone else has been dragged into the case by the family itself," he claimed.
"Nawaz Sharif had to provide details about two companies and the flats. He was the one who involved his son in the case, and the son then involved Maryam in the case."
"Maryam Nawaz needs to present herself to the JIT because of Nawaz Sharif and Hussain Nawaz's statements," he claimed, adding that "Hussain Nawaz placed all the blame on his grandfather Mian Sharif."
"So Hussain placed blame on his grandfather and a Qatari businessman, both of whom have passed away, and the information Hussain has given to the JIT can not be be verified," he continued, adding that "The truth is that Mian Sharif's passport does not have a visa stamped to Qatar."
The JIT has repeatedly questioned Maryam's brothers Hussain and Hassan, while it has also recorded the statements of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his brother Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, the PM’s son-in-law retired Captain Mohammad Safdar, the PM’s cousin Tariq Shafi, and Finance Minister Ishaq Dar — the father-in-law of the PM’s younger daughter.
Although her name appeared in the Panama Papers as the beneficial owner of the offshore companies — Nielsen Enterprises and Nescoll Ltd — which owned the four Park Lane apartments at the heart of the Supreme Court case, Maryam was virtually cleared by the apex court in the Panama Papers controversy.
The court stated that the PM’s daughter "has received cash gifts from her father in substantial amounts on various occasions … receipt of gifts from the father does not necessarily make respondent No.6 (Maryam) his (Nawaz Sharif’s) dependent in the legal sense of the word".