SMOKERS’ CORNER: LESSONS FROM PS-114
Right after it became clear that the PPP candidate Saeed Ghani was going to win the hotly contested by-election in the PS-114 constituency in Karachi, I received the following SMS from a veteran PPP worker who has been serving the party in this city for decades: “Salam, Paracha sahib. As you can see Saeed is winning. This proves Zardari Saaab [sic] wrong because Saeed, a common PPP worker, defeated influence of big shot Marwat in this area which supports PTI. And Zardari wanted Marwat in party.”
The PPP has never won this Sindh provincial assembly seat. When I called the PPP worker who had been texting me, he said (in Urdu): “People of all ethnicities, religions and sects who reside here [in PS-114] voted for Saeed because they see him as a common middle-class man who is committed, decent and educated.”
The worker again reminded me how the PPP co-chairperson Asif Ali Zardari had agreed to let Irfanullah Marwat join the PPP, until Zardari’s two daughters refused to let him in the party due to a scandal he was allegedly a part of in the early 1990s. Marwat had won this seat (on a PML-N ticket) in the 2013 election.
Insulting your electorate’s traditional voting pattern yields you no votes
Even though he was unseated by the Supreme Court for election fraud (thus the recent by-election), Marwat still wields considerable influence here. That’s why, when the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) candidate, M. Najeeb Haroon, managed to convince Marwat to support PTI in the by-election, most media commentators believed that Najeeb’s prospects (of winning) had greatly increased.
But the final results exhibited an entirely different scenario. PTI managed just 5,098 votes, even less than a weak PML-N candidate (5,353). The veteran PPP worker I was talking to said something very interesting during our conversation: “Imran Khan [the PTI chief] has started to think like Zardari,” he laughed.
He then added: “He [Imran] now thinks all of Pakistan’s constituencies can be won through influential and moneyed ‘electables.’ This is not true. PPP gave tickets to many common workers in 1970 and most of them won. In 1988, Benazir Bhutto also agreed to give party tickets to a few committed workers, and they all won. Bilawal [Zardari’s son] wants committed, common workers to contest elections, but his father is still stuck with moneyed candidates. Indeed, they too are important in many constituencies, but the voters of various other areas reject them because they [the candidates] are not one of their own. People are no fools.”
He raised his voice while uttering the last statement (“People are no fools”). It clearly alluded to the way many folks these days (especially on social media sites) begin to curse the voters if their candidate loses an election. This phenomenon is relatively new.
When I was going through academic papers, books and newspaper articles on Pakistan’s elections since 1970 during my research for both of my books (End of the Past and The Pakistan Anti-Hero), I did not come across even a single statement by an author, commentator or a disappointed voter claiming that the voters were fools.
But recently it has been noticed that every time a PTI candidate loses an election, its supporters begin to attack the voters for being ill-informed and foolish. However, PTI chairman Imran Khan, his party’s senior leadership and its candidates do not deal in such accusations.