Govt struggles to win support on delimitation
ISLAMABAD: The ruling Pakistan Muslim League (PML-N) on Monday formed a five-member committee to develop a consensus on the question of fresh delimitations ahead of the 2018 general elections.
The decision was taken in a meeting, chaired by party chief Nawaz Sharif, held at the Punjab House.
The committee is headed by National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq and consists of Law Minister Zahid Hamid, Railways Minister Khawaja Saad Rafique, Minister for States and Frontier Regions retired Lt Gen Abdul Qadir Baloch and president of the PML-N’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chapter, Amir Muqam.
The committee has been assigned the task of meeting leaders from all the political parties to remove their concerns over the census issue in order to ensure timely elections, which are due in August next year.
Briefing reporters after the party meeting, Interior Minister Ahsan Iqbal said it was the collective responsibility of all political parties to ensure that elections were held on time so the country could witness another smooth democratic transition.
Mr Iqbal was of the view that the results of the latest census had sent a good message to the smaller provinces, as their representation in parliament would increase.
He said that census was not conducted by the government alone, rather it was “separately” carried by the government and the army and then the results were tabulated. He said they had accepted the census results with an open heart, despite the fact that Punjab was about to lose nine seats.
He also claimed that all the parties had earlier agreed to the constitutional amendment, but it was surprising for the PML-N to see them backtracking from their earlier commitments.
The interior minister said that they could face difficulties in holding the elections on time if they did not get the constitutional amendment bill passed from parliament by Nov 10.
“We request all the parties to cooperate with the government instead of finding excuses, for the sake of the country and democracy,” he added.
Sharif forms five-member body to convince other parties; parliamentary leaders to meet again today
Mr Iqbal ruled out the possibility of holding elections on the basis of the 1998 census, as suggested by the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP). He said it would be unfair to the smaller provinces.
He also rejected the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s (PTI) demand for early elections, saying that the party was only making such a demand because it had no confidence in the members of the KP Assembly, who could possibly cause embarrassment for them at the time of the Senate elections in March next year.
NA session
Earlier, the government had to abruptly prorogue National Assembly proceedings after it failed to develop a consensus among political parties over the issue of delimitation on the basis of provisional census data.
This was the third consecutive sitting where the PML-N had failed to ensure the presence of two-thirds of members required for the passage of a constitutional amendment seeking the re-allocation of seats of the legislatures. All parties had, during a meeting of the House Business Advisory Committee on Nov 2, agreed to run the session until Nov 14.
One reason for the absence of key PML-N leaders and ministers was the party meeting, being held simultaneously, to discuss the census and delimitation issues.
Even Speaker Ayaz Sadiq expressed his annoyance over the lack of interest shown by treasury members after a number of opposition members, including government ally Zafarullah Khan Jamali, lashed out at the government for taking proceedings “non-seriously”.
But the speaker, who said he was thinking of proroguing the session to allow parties more time to reach a consensus on the constitutional amendment bill, also proceeded to the Punjab House meeting, leaving the deputy speaker with the task of reading out the prorogation order.
Mr Sadiq had warned that if the lawmakers failed to pass the amendment soon, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) could take the matter to the Supreme Court, saying that it seemed as if the amendment, which would benefit the smaller provinces by increasing their seats in the legislature, was being deliberately delayed.