FICTION: UNINTENDED SATIRE
The Tea Trolley — Rehana Alam’s first novel — is a self-contained story that will resonate with women of all ages in Pakistan. Set in 1979, the book centres on Amna, a young lady of marriageable age who, at her parents’ behest, is in the midst of a revolving door of suitors.
The book perfectly embodies the ‘mother knows best’ mindset, mainly seen through Amna’s conversations and internal dialogue. As nice a person as she is, Amna spends the whole novel deferring to her mother and barely having an original thought. Though she attends university, her world is small — restricted to one friend, receiving suitors and sitting through visits from relatives and her parents’ friends. She appears to have completely surrendered her fate to her parents’ wishes. We are not privy to any other facet of her personality other than the ‘good girl’ persona: “Ammi screened out the unacceptable suggestions and about once a fortnight I had to present myself, pushing the tea trolley, to interested parties”; “I changed into the Ammi-approved clothes”; “Clad in one of the approved joras, and with a sense of helplessness, I entered the drawing room behind the tea trolley once again”; “Ammi returned and approved of my gracious hostess role.”
The present action of the book is interspersed with stories of marriages past. These are the most engaging parts of the narrative. In fact, if the whole novel had been made up of these sordid, tragic or hopeful tales of how women married and how they fared, this would have made for a much more original and entertaining read.
A debut novel with relatable stereotypes of Pakistani women does not offer any commentary on them or develop them into engaging characters
Perhaps to keep with the time period of the book — the 1970s — the author gives the impression that the perfect wife is a woman who is fair in demeanour and colour, adept at running the house, self-sacrificing, frugal and skilled at entertaining. Good food and the husband’s comfort are what matter; all that is required from the husband, on the other hand, is that he provide well for the family and be polite — as one visitor describes her marriage: “I made sure he had clean shirts in his closet and the food of his choice on the table. I considered that to be my role as wife. He... rarely noticed what I ate or wore. But he was unfailingly polite, a good provider, a fond father... It was a good marriage then, but my face did not glow.”
This is an old-school view that many may relate to as it is trite and overdone. As you read you wonder if the book will go beyond this, if maybe Amna will be more than this. There is no mention of personal fulfilment or the joy of togetherness in a way that is taken seriously, or even considered achievable. The few women in the book who have taken control of their lives have done so at personal or social sacrifice. One of them, Amna’s aunt Azra, who is “plain of face and dark in complexion”, has received no proposals of marriage. When she finally does, and marries a widower many years her senior, she rises above her boring husband and insipid marriage and becomes a successful businesswoman. Her tale delivers one of the best lines in the book, “…she didn’t divorce Najeeb Khalu, but she made him redundant.”
Despite her “killer instinct and sharp spirit of competition”, Azra is eccentric, brash and rude. This is in keeping with how successful women are labelled in society — they are given unflattering epithets and their success is attributed to their overbearing personality rather than their skill and mental acuity. Further, the author presents another insular view by describing moneyed characters as boastful, insensitive and not self-actualised whilst presenting those who are not rich as hardworking, honest and humble.
One incident in the book further demonstrates a long-ingrained bias in the subcontinent, when Amna has the misfortune of receiving a proposal from someone of a hue darker than is acceptable: “His family... formed a wall of coffee-coloured faces for me to look at as I rolled in the tea trolley. Everyone had extremely dark complexions and even though no one in our family had unreasonable prejudices, six or eight dark brown people crowded in an average sized drawing room can be overwhelming.”