As one of the most commonly consumed drinks around the world, coffee has enjoyed a fairly good reputation. Several researchers discovered in a variety of studies that drinking coffee has a positive impact on the consumer’s health. Medical scientists at London’s Imperial College said they have found that drinking more coffee could lengthen a person’s lifespan — even if it is decaffeinated — as it is linked to a lower risk of death, particularly for heart diseases and diseases of the gut.
It was further stated that people who drank three cups of coffee a day enjoyed 19 percent lower risk of death from heart attack or stroke, at least 18 percent lower risk of getting cancer (if they are non-smokers), about 29 percent lower risk of fatty liver disease, and 30 percent lower risk of Type-2 diabetes.
All of this good news was suddenly brushed aside last month in Los Angeles by Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle who ruled that in the state of California, coffee must be sold with a cancer warning because a chemical which is produced during the roasting process could potentially lead to cancer.
You don’t just drink coffee, you can eat it too
Coffee sellers argue that this chemical called acrylamide was present at harmless levels and it results naturally from the cooking process needed to make the coffee beans flavourful. In fact, they argued, in 2016 the WHO’s Agency for Research on Cancer moved coffee off its “possible carcinogen” list. Their supporters point out that this ruling means that even pumpkin puree and French fries should be sold with a cancer label as both contain trace amounts of acrylamide.
Professor John Ioannidis at California’s Stanford University has placed himself squarely with the defendants: “I am not the least concerned about coffee being a problem for causing cancer. The amounts of acrylamide people are exposed to in their coffee are so low that it’s hard to say it’d cause cancer. Among the zillions of things that surround us coffee is among the safest in terms of cancer risk.”