SMOKERS’ CORNER: MANIFESTO TRUTHS
It is often believed that party manifestos in Pakistan only play a rudimentary role. Therefore, the parties hardly put any significant effort in writing them. They concentrate more on coining catchy populist slogans and rhetoric designed to undermine and mock their opponents’ verbal bombast.
Yet, this was not always the case. Recently while going through newspaper reports in various Urdu and English dailies published in Pakistan just months before the historic 1970 elections, I came across numerous articles closely dissecting the manifestos of almost every major political party that was contesting the vote.
I also came across a now defunct Urdu daily and English weekly which carried photos of men huddled at a street corner in Karachi, reading and discussing a party’s manifesto.
If one goes through two of the most detailed analyses of the 1970 elections — Craig Baxter’s Pakistan Votes-1970 (1971) and Phillip E. Jones’ The Pakistan People’s Party: Rise to Power ( 2003) — they are likely to observe that party manifestos carried a lot of weight and importance during the 1970 elections. That is why some of the most thoughtful manifestos ever authored in Pakistan largely appeared just before the 1970 polls.
Manifestos are complex documents, often authored by intellectuals, economists and trained ideologues, whose job is to dissect a country’s economic, political and social conditions, and explain how a party would address issues triggered by these conditions.
The decline in the quality of political party manifestos does not mean that they are irrelevant
Unfortunately, from the 1980s onwards, party manifestos in Pakistan have stopped being robust intellectual exercises. They are published just because they have to be. They are hardly ever analysed in detail anymore by political commentators who are supposed to break them down for voters to read and absorb.
Just like voters, the media and its commentators too are often busy dissecting what is actually nothing more than day-to-day political gossip. Over the decades, a decline in the quality of manifestos in Pakistan has paralleled a decline in the quality of political commentators.
During my research on the subject, I also discovered how important a role the manifesto of Pakistan’s founding party, the All India Muslim League (AIML), played in galvanising activists and voters during the 1946 elections in British India. The AIML’s victory in all the Muslim-majority areas in these elections was the catalyst that hurried the creation of Pakistan in 1947.
The May 23, 1945 issue of the now defunct Eastern Times (published from Lahore) reported that young men and women activists of the AIML had been conducting an intense election campaign in the Punjab after thoroughly studying the party’s manifesto.
It’s a remarkable manifesto. Not lengthy by any means, and every word in it carries a lot of weight. Originally published on October 31, 1944, it was largely written by a small group of ideologues headed by a Muslim member of the Communist Party of India. The gentleman was Daniyal Latifi whose entry into the AIML had been green-lighted by party chief Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
In her 2000 book, Self and Sovereignty, professor of history and author Ayesha Jalal has scrutinised this manifesto in some detail. The manifesto speaks of a Pakistan which would be beneficial for both Muslims as well as non-Muslims under AIML rule.