Election tribunal rejects Sardar Ghulam Abbas, nephew’s writ petitions
CHAKWAL: Writ petitions filed by influential Chakwal politician Sardar Ghulam Abbas and his nephew Sardar Aftab Akbar were dismissed by the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) election tribunal on Thursday on grounds of tax evasion.
Mr Abbas was the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) candidate for NA-64 (Chakwal-I), and Mr Akbar was his covering candidate.
Mr Abbas and Mr Akbar had filed writ petitions before an election tribunal in Lahore after Justice Ibadur Rehman Lodhi of the appellate bench rejected their papers in response to an objection raised by two lawyers from the constituency.
Candidates’ supporters, lawyers surprised by verdict, intend to appeal in SC
Qazi Umar Ahmed and Malik Zafran Zulfi from the Chakwal Bar Association had objected to the two candidates’ nomination papers, arguing that they had wilfully concealed their assets and evaded taxes because they did not have national tax numbers (NTN).
Their objections were initially dismissed by the returning officer, who accepted the papers on June 19. They then filed an appeal, on the basis of which Justice Lodhi rejected the candidates’ papers on June 27.
Although the tribunal granted them a temporary dispensation on June 28, the same night the PTI awarded a party ticket to Zulfiqar Ali Khan Dullah, previously the PML-N candidate for PP-23 (Chakwal-III) against Mr Akbar, for NA-64.
Mr Akbar remains PTI’s candidate in PP-23, where no one has objected to his constituency. He will face PML-N’s retired Col Mushtaq Ahmed.
Their counsel Mohammad Ahsan Bhoon said before the court that the petitioners had already filed affidavits with the Election Commission of Pakistan, which had also been transmitted to the Supreme Court. He also challenged the July 27 verdict for being out of the appellate tribunal’s domain.
However, the election tribunal, comprising justices Sardar Ahmed Naeem and Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, dismissed Mr Abbas and Mr Akbar’s writ petitions mainly on the grounds of tax evasion.
The order left the petitioners, their supporters and lawyers shocked.