DAWN.COM

Today's Paper | December 23, 2024

Updated 25 Aug, 2018 11:00am

Trump faces impeachment threat after lawyer’s accusation

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump confronted calls for impeachment on Friday after his former lawyer Michael Cohen accused him of orchestrating a campaign cover-up to buy the silence of two women who claimed he had affairs with them.

Trump took to Twitter to accuse Cohen of making up “stories in order to get a deal” from federal prosecutors.

Michael Cohen had pleaded guilty on Tuesday to eight charges, including campaign finance violations that he said he carried out in coordination with Trump. Behind closed doors, Trump expressed worry and frustration that a man intimately familiar with his political, personal and business dealings for more than a decade had turned on him.

As Trump vented his frustration, White House aides sought to project a sense of calm. Used to the ever-present shadow of federal investigations, numbed West Wing staffers absorbed near-simultaneous announcements of the Cohen plea deal and the conviction of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort on financial charges.

Manafort faces trial on separate charges next month in the District of Columbia that include acting as a foreign agent.

US president publicly denies he had done anything wrong, arguing in an interview that the payments weren’t ‘even a campaign violation’

But the White House signalled no clear strategy for managing the fallout. At a briefing on Thursday, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders insisted at least seven times that Trump had done nothing wrong and was not the subject of criminal charges. She referred substantive questions to the president’s personal counsel Rudy Giuliani, who was at a golf course in Scotland.

Outside allies of the White House said they had received little guidance on how to respond to the events in their appearances on cable news. And it was not clear the West Wing was assembling any kind of coordinated response.

President Trump himself publicly denied wrongdoing, sitting down with his favoured programme Fox & Friends for an interview. In the interview, he argued, incorrectly, that the hush-money payouts weren’t “even a campaign violation” because he subsequently reimbursed Cohen for the payments personally instead of with campaign funds.

Federal law restricts how much individuals can donate to a campaign, bars corporations from making direct contributions and requires the disclosure of transactions.

Cohen had said on Tuesday he secretly used shell companies to make payments used to silence former Playboy model Karen McDougal and adult-film actress Stormy Daniels for the purpose of influencing the 2016 election.

Trump has insisted that he only found out about the payments after they were made, despite the release of a September 2016 taped conversation in which Trump and Cohen can be heard discussing a deal to pay McDougal for her story of a 2006 affair she says she had with Trump.

Shifting accounts

The White House denied the president had lied, with Sanders calling the assertion “ridiculous”. Yet she offered no explanation for Trump’s shifting accounts.

That Cohen was in trouble was no surprise. Federal prosecutors had raided his offices months ago, but Trump and his allies were caught off-guard when he also pleaded guilty to campaign finance crimes, which, for the first time, took the swirling criminal probes directly to the president.

Both cases resulted, at least in part, from the work of special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russia’s alleged attempts to sway voters in the 2016 election.

“The only thing that I have done wrong,” Trump tweeted, “is to win an election that was expected to be won by crooked Hillary Clinton and the Democrats. The problem is, they forgot to campaign in numerous states!”

Meanwhile, Cohen’s lawyer, Lanny Davis, said his client has information “that would be of interest” to the special counsel.

“There are subjects that Michael Cohen could address that would be of interest to the special counsel,” Davis said in a series of television interviews. Davis also said Cohen is not looking for a presidential pardon.

Trump, in turn, praised Manafort as “a brave man” raising speculation the former campaign operative could become the recipient of a pardon.

Manafort, Trump wrote, had “tremendous pressure on him and, unlike Michael Cohen, he refused to break”.

Sanders said the matter of a pardon for Manafort had not been discussed.

Among Trump allies, the back-to-back blows were a harbinger of dark days to come for the president. Democrats are eagerly anticipating gaining subpoena power over the White House and many are openly discussing the possibility of impeaching Trump should they retake control of the House in November’s mid-term elections. And even Trump loyalists acknowledged the judicial proceedings were a blow to the Republicans’ chances of retaining their majority this year.

“They have survived the Russia thing, but no one knows what’s next,” said former campaign aide Barry Bennett.

Legal Theory

Debate swirled inside and outside the White House about next steps and how damaging the legal fallout was for the president.

Allies of the president stressed an untested legal theory that a sitting president cannot be indicted, but can be impeached.

Former White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci argued that “at the end of the day it will be up to the House and the Senate to decide on the president’s presidency”.

Former George W. Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer stressed that the revelations may be sordid, but do not meet the constitutional bar of “high crimes and misdemeanours”.

“Having an affair and lying about it with a porn star and a Playboy bunny is not impeachable,” Fleischer said. “It’s Donald Trump.”

Published in Dawn, August 25th, 2018

Read Comments

May 9 riots: Military courts hand 25 civilians 2-10 years’ prison time Next Story