Four heads of government and state — all elected and currently in power — are judged in essays penned by four noted writers from their own countries. Put together by Vijay Prashad, a Marxist intellectual, journalist, author and chief editor at LeftWord Books, a publishing house that focuses on the interests of working people and movements for social transformation, the main premise of Strongmen: Trump, Modi, Erdogan, Duterte is that capitalism has failed to help improve humanity. In fact, it has worsened its condition and made a tiny world population — 0.01 percent — staggeringly wealthy, so much so that inaccessible, complex global financial systems and institutions have been built to protect that wealth at the expense of exploiting the destitute further.
The consequent reaction — desperation and escalating anger among the helpless masses — is a major danger for the rich minority who controls the global resources. Therefore, in order to curb and divert the lurking threat posed by the ordinary people of the world, ruthless authoritarian or fascist ‘strongmen’ are solicited, deployed and provided tangible distractions such as terrorism, drug dealers and illegal immigrants. As a result of this collective strategy by the haves, the real issues of poverty, lack of resources and hopelessness of the billions is pushed aside.
This lean book discusses an important idea — a phenomenon that might be shaping our entire world — by sampling Donald Trump in the United States, Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkey, Narendra Modi in India and Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines. Editions of the book published internationally take note of one more leader; however, for reasons not explained, the Pakistani edition brought out by Folio Books, Lahore, excludes the fifth strongman: Vladimir Putin.
A polemical new book looks at the rise of the popularly elected dictator around the world
Each case is elaborated by an essayist from the respective country. Essentially, it is about how authoritarian elected leaders with a tyrannical streak and permissive approach towards the rule of law, are managing the ballot to consolidate their power for the said goal. The editorial input seems a kind of an attempt to revive the receding ideology of communism by highlighting growing global fascist leanings — the essays concentrate on the plight of the common people and workers under oppressive governments headed by these strongmen, who are in turn backed by the wealthy capitalists.
In scrutinising Trump in ‘A Fable’, Eve Ensler, award-winning playwright, activist and author of The Vagina Monologues, says that Trump is a deadly “virus” that has not only spread its tentacles through his native country, but also infected leaders of other countries: “One classic theory is that the thuggish man had become what no one had yet become in the time of late date consumption and greed. He had evolved or devolved (depending on your perspective) into what the psychologists later came to define as ‘genocidal narcissist’ — a person willing and able to destroy everyone and everything on the planet as long as it makes him feel momentarily better. That extreme and total endgame narcissism made the oafish man a perfect super host for the virus.” Ensler believes that the hope for surviving this virus lies in “solidarity, imagination and love.”
In ‘Vanity of the Tyrant’, Indian actor, poet and writer Danish Husain delves into Modi’s background — from his father to his early rise through the ranks and his “apprenticeship both in the fascistic Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and as a careful observer of Indian politics.” Husain also expands on the life and personality of V.D. Savarkar, “the architect of Hindutva (Hinduness), the ideology of RSS and BJP.”
Young Savarkar wrote Essentials of Hindutva (1923), and Hindutva: Who is a Hindu? (1928), expounding on his theory of territorial nationalism. Husain writes, “Unless a people’s beliefs, their religion and their myths do not align with their territorial nationalism, their loyalty to the nation is suspect. Muslims and Christians — [Savarkar] declared — had other territorial loyalties and were therefore not to be trusted.” He adds, “At the age of 12, he led a mob to vandalise a mosque. There is a thick line that unites Savarkar to Modi.”