Forest Inspection House in Kumrat
The overemphasis, to the extent of sounding hackneyed, on tourism as a panacea for our economic ills appears to be without solid grounds and reasons.
In quite a large number of Muslim countries, alcohol is freely available to tourists. In Pakistan, drinking alcohol is prohibited by law. While in the rest of the country, non-Muslim foreigners can consume spirits under licence, the same limited freedom is disallowed in KP. It is an altogether different fact, however, that boozers in KP find little difficulty in procuring whatever hard drink they want to soothe their nerves with. In the face of such striking pretensions and crippling restrictions, it is indeed too far-fetched to expect that we could ever tempt tourists to visit us.
The foregoing also renders meaningless any comparisons with our neighbouring countries in the field of tourism. In 2017-2018, according to the Pakistan Tourism Development Corporation, only 1.7 million tourists visited Pakistan in 2017, while — according to the World Tourism and Travel Council — tourism contributed 2.7 per cent to Pakistan’s $313 billion GDP. This comes out to be less than 8.5 billion dollars which, in all probability, is made up of visa fees, airline tickets and hotel charges from the hotels operating in the formal sector. While this may be so, given our peculiar nature of culture and habits, our domestic tourists —especially those from KP — prefer to look after themselves rather than letting their adventure lead to the creation of favourable employment opportunities for others.
India, during the same period, earned more than 260 billion US dollars from tourism, leading to the creation of thousands of jobs. While this comparison may be misleading on some counts, we have to agree that India offers more freedom and security to the tourists than Pakistan does.
Also, we need to know that the international perspective on tourism is fast changing. According to the cover story in Time magazine’s August 18 issue, las year, faced with an annual intake of about 700 million tourists, many European countries are considering measures to stem the tide. These measures include higher rates of taxes for tourists, imposing fines and limiting the number of daily visitors to certain places. The mass movement of tourists in Europe is being considered a threat not only to the maintenance and preservation of famous landmarks but it is also feared that this trend is negatively impacting the lifestyles of the local communities.
It may not be an exaggeration to say that Pakistan’s most prized landmark is its wilderness, some of which may still be out of harm’s way. Here, we have a choice: we can preserve our wilderness from our domestic tourists to present it to the outside world through which we can earn some little foreign exchange (as revenue from tourism per se is revenue from export). But banking too much on bettering our lot from tourism appears to be a misplaced hope.
The writer is a freelancer and author of Less Than Civil: The State of Civil Service in KP. nasseryousaf@gmail.com
Published in Dawn, EOS, June 16th, 2019