Illustration by Ahmed Amin
Come the month of December and we, as a nation, begin preparations to celebrate the birthday of one of the greatest men in history. You all must have guessed who I am referring to. Yes, the founder of Pakistan who we refer to as the Father of the Nation: Quaid-i-Azam Mohammed Ali Jinnah.
Schools arrange special programmes and students take part in declamation contests and speeches highlighting various aspects of the Quaid’s life. Along with special programmes, excerpts from his speeches are telecast throughout the day on TV and radio.
In whatever way possible, we show our love for our great leader. We know that Quaid-i-Azam worked relentlessly day and night, along with his team, and earned for us this independent state which we call our home and should be proud of it as it is our identity. And on this day we pay homage to the man who devoted his life to make Pakistan a reality.
It is not only us, Pakistanis, who acknowledge his hard work and shower praise on him. Eminent world leaders have spoken highly of him, not only during his life, but paid great tributes after his death too. He received tributes from everyone who met him or had some close dealing with him for his intelligence, courage, integrity and firm belief in truth.
For his tireless effort and dedication for the cause of Pakistan, US historian Stanley Wolpert, in his 1984 book Jinnah of Pakistan, wrote: “Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with creating a nation state. Muhammad Ali Jinnah did all three.”
John Biggs-Davison, a Conservative Member of Parliament in the UK, said: “Although without Gandhi, Hindustan would still have gained independence and without Lenin and Mao, Russia and China would still have endured Communist revolution, without Jinnah there would have been no Pakistan in 1947.”
Even his adversaries have praised him for the fact that it was Jinnah who changed the map of the world. Mrs Vijay Lakshmi Pundit, Nehru’s sister and a prominent figure, stated, “If the Muslim League had 100 Gandhis and 200 Azads and Congress had only one Jinnah, then India would not have been divided!”
Even Lord Mountbatten, the last viceroy of India, admitted that “If it could be said that any single man held the future of India in his palm, that man is Mohammad Ali Jinnah. For all intents and purposes, Jinnah was the Muslim League and if the dream of Pakistan ever did come true, it could be Jinnah who brought it to life and fashioned it.”
He further said that Jinnah had a “consuming determination to realise the dream of Pakistan.” And he remained focused on that till his death.
Acknowledging Jinnah’s fight for the rights of his people throughout his life, Surat Chandra Bose, leader of the forward bloc wing of the Indian National Congress, paying tribute to him succinctly summed up his personal and political achievements in these words: “Mr Jinnah was great as a lawyer, once great as a Congressman, great as a leader of Muslims, great as a world politician and diplomat, and greatest of all as a man of action. By Mr Jinnah’s passing away, the world has lost one of the greatest statesmen and Pakistan its life-giver, philosopher and guide.”
Quaid-i-Azam was not only a historic figure, an epoch-making man, he had a gifted personality which left a deep impact on everyone. He was upright, straightforward, sincere and direct — no double game, no deceitful ways and no trickery at all.
Patrick Spens, the last Chief Justice of undivided India, paid tribute to Jinnah in the following words: “The tallness of the man, the immaculate manner in which he turned out, the beauty of his features and the extreme courtesy with which he treated all; no one could have made a more favourable impression than he did. There is no man or woman living who imputes anything against his honour or his honesty. He was the most outright person that I know.”
British economist and editor, H.V. Hudson in his book The Great Divide, eulogised Quaid’s character in these words, “Not even his political enemies ever accused Jinnah of corruption or self seeking. He could be bought by no one, and for no price. Nor was he in the least degree weathercock, swinging in the wind of popularity or changing the times. He was a steadfast idealist as well as a man of scrupulous honour.”