PML-N's Saiful Malook moves LHC against Sibtain Khan's election as Punjab Assembly speaker
PML-N’s Saiful Malook Khokhar, who lost to PTI’s Sibtain Khan in the contest for the Punjab Assembly speaker last night, challenged his rival’s election in the Lahore High Court on Saturday, maintaining that it was held in an “illegal and unconstitutional manner”.
In Friday’s election — which was held after former speaker Parvez Elahi was declared the Punjab chief minister in a long-drawn-out battle against PML-N’s Hamza Shehbaz — Sibtain had stood victorious with 185 votes of the total 364, while Khokhar had managed to secure 175.
In a petition filed by Khokhar’s lawyer Mansoor Usman Awan on his behalf today, the PML-N lawmaker argued that the “impugned” election of the Punjab Assembly speaker was held in violation of Article 226 of the Constitution as votes had not been cast through a secret ballot.
“The ballot papers and counterfoils were serial numbered in such a manner that a choice exercised by each MPA could be identified by comparing the serial number on the ballot paper and serial number and signatures of MPAs on the counterfoils of the ballot papers. Asa result, the secrecy of the ballot could easily be breached,” Khokhar contended.
“That non-holding of the election of the speaker through a secret ballot is blatantly unconstitutional, illegal and without jurisdiction,” the petition read.
Khokhar further pointed out that under the Constitution and Rules of Procedure of the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, 1997, the province’s governor was to decide the date for the speaker’s election after the position fell vacant.
“It is the prerogative of the governor to fix a date for the election of a new speaker if the assembly is in session, as soon as possible during that session, and if the assembly is not in session, at the commencement of the next session,” his petition stated.
Instead, he said, permission was sought to move a resolution for suspending the relevant assembly rules, especially the governor’s powers to summon a session for the speaker’s election, in the house the panel of chairmen — whose members presides over proceedings in the absence of the speaker and deputy speaker — granted the permission.
Highlighting that the panel of chairmen was from the treasury benches, Khokhar said the resolution for suspending the assembly rules was then “quickly” adopted by treasury members.
On these grounds, Khokhar urged the court to declare the speaker’s election “void” and issue directives for holding the poll, “strictly in accordance with the provisions of Article226 of the Constitution”.
He further prayed the court to restrain Sibatin from “exercising powers and functions of the speaker” during the pendency of his petition.
PML-N wants case be taken up before deputy speaker’s election
Meanwhile, at a press conference earlier today, PML-N leaders Rana Mashhood and Atta Tarar demanded that the decision on the PA speaker’s election should be taken before the election of the deputy speaker.
Tarar requested the chief justice of the LHC to fix the petition for today. “This is a violation of our fundamental rights. The courts are custodians and it is their responsibility to ensure the secrecy of the votes and its sanctity.”
Through the writ petition, he continued, “we request the court to declare this court null and void because it was against the Constitution”.
Meanwhile, Mashhood alleged that “hundreds of transfers” had taken place in the last two days.
“While Punjab’s public is dying of hunger, there is an announcement that billions [of rupees] will be given to MPAs. Where are the courts? Why can’t we see suo motu [notices] and judicial activism today?”
Referring to the Supreme Court, Mashhood said that it treated PTI leaders as “favourites” but didn’t list petitions of those who “truly represent Pakistan and want to make it stable and prosperous.”
“We request that our petition is heard today because the deputy speaker election is tomorrow,” he went on adding that the PA proceedings couldn’t proceed when the first step itself was wrong.
“We should see your judicial activism today as well,” he added.