Joyless Punjab
THE elation was short-lived. When the federal government finally acquiesced to public demands to allow Joyland to be screened in cinemas, the Punjab government eagerly stepped up to play the villain’s role. Its stubborn insistence on keeping the film off any screen within its jurisdiction “in the wake of persistent complaints received from different quarters” is quite a shame. It shows that its priorities lie not in upholding constitutionally granted freedoms of speech and expression but in pandering to the religious orthodoxy. This makes it the second time in the past few months that the Punjab government has sought to make the most of the sometimes irrational fears and apprehensions of the right. First, it intruded into citizens’ personal affairs by making unnecessary changes to the nikahnama; now, it has taken it upon itself to decide what the people should and should not watch in cinemas.
Targeted by the ultra-conservative — who very likely have not even seen the film, yet somehow have been scandalised by the story it tells — Joyland had, till Thursday, seemed destined to join other path-breaking cinematic projects by Pakistani filmmakers which have been buried under the country’s vacuous censorship laws. A public outcry eventually forced the federal government to rethink an earlier decision to withdraw the film’s certificate. Thankfully, it decided it was best not to deprive Pakistanis of an opportunity to experience what is reportedly one of the best works their compatriots have produced in recent years. However, the Punjab government seems to have had no qualms about keeping to a more Neanderthal approach. It has upheld the ban in a naked display of power that follows no real logic, even though the central censor board and the government now both agree the film can be screened to audiences. To still deprive the people of the country’s most populous province of a chance to understand the lived experiences of people who occupy the margins of our society is no service to the nation. It is merely petty and contemptible.
Published in Dawn, November 19th, 2022