Plan to disarm militants
TOP Taliban leaders could be offered exile outside Afghanistan if they agree to stop fighting the government of Hamid Karzai, a long-expected peace plan by the Afghan government will propose later this month.
The far-reaching proposals, seen by the Guardian, also call for “deradicalisation” classes for insurgents and thousands of new manual jobs created for foot soldiers who renounce violence.
The long-delayed Afghan Peace and Reintegration Programme has emerged just as Karzai prepares to go to Washington for talks with Barack Obama, where the issue is likely to be top of the agenda.
The plan will then be presented later in the month to a gathering of representatives from across Afghanistan called the National Consultative Peace Jirga. Once agreed upon, the government will be able to start spending around $160m pledged by the international community to lure fighters away from the conflict. The document refers to such fighters as “angry brothers”, reflecting the belief that a substantial portion of insurgents are not motivated by strong ideological beliefs.
Little is said in the report about the Taliban leaders managing the war against Hamid Karzai's government. However, it does say insurgent leaders could face “potential exile in a third country”.
Saudi Arabia has been used in the past for such purposes, and there has been widespread speculation that exile could be offered to Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the leader of the Hizb-i-Islami armed group, which in March sent a peace delegation to Kabul for talks with Karzai.
Western powers are likely to be pleased by the level of detail about the new High Level Peace Council, which will take over from a notoriously chaotic predecessor body accused of reintegrating fighters who subsequently took up arms again.
However, diplomats are worried that the government lacks the capacity to implement a programme that calls for complex activities in around 4,000 villages most affected by the insurgency. One diplomat said “For the international community money is not a problem, they will pay whatever it takes. One gets a sense that there are people on the military side who will do most of the work and then give it some sort of an Afghan face.”
The High Council and its executive body will be in charge of processing fighters who want to live peacefully. They will initially be put in “demobilisation centres” for a “cooling off” period of 90 days where their needs can be assessed and their personal security assured.
If they agree to lay down their arms and cut ties with Al Qaeda they will be entitled to an amnesty against prosecution for any crimes they may have committed. They will also be issued with a biometric “reintegration card”. They will then be offered a “menu” of options designed to keep them peacefully occupied, including vocational training in such trades as carpet-weaving and tailoring.
There will also be the option to go through “deradicalisation” training, of the sort pioneered by Saudi Arabia. However, the report acknowledges the complexity of such programmes, the lack of “adequate experience” in Afghanistan and the likely need to send “highly radicalised” people to other countries for treatment.
Major new institutions will also be set up to manage enormous job-creation schemes. An Engineering and Construction Corps will focus on labour-intensive work, such as the construction of Afghanistan's national highway system and other large-scale infrastructure projects.
It also envisages teams of ex-Taliban fighters being rapidly deployed to respond to emergencies such as floods and landslides. By far the most controversial option is the option for former insurgents to join the Afghan army or police force.
— The Guardian, London