Malik Riaz loses right to ‘Bahria’ brand name

Published March 28, 2015
Court rules against real estate tycoon in decade-old case over right to use naval nomenclature.— AFP/File
Court rules against real estate tycoon in decade-old case over right to use naval nomenclature.— AFP/File

RAWALPINDI: Malik Riaz Hussain’s real estate empire was dealt a blow on Friday after the property tycoon lost a long-drawn legal battle over the right to the name ‘Bahria Town’.

A local court in Rawalpindi, handing down a verdict in the over a decade old case between the naval subsidiary Bahria Foundation and Malik Riaz, accepted the former’s petition – originally filed in 2002 – to restrain the magnate from using the name ‘Bahria’ for his housing society.

“We will appeal this order at the next appellate forum accordingly,” Qaiser Qadeer Qureshi, Mr Riaz’s legal adviser, said.

He told Dawn: “So far, the court announced a short order and are awaiting a detailed verdict. After examining that, Bahria Town will file an appeal.”

According to Mr Qureshi, the appellate forum could be the high court or a district and sessions court.

Take a look: Here's how to house the poor in Pakistan...

According to the details of the case, Hussain Global – a property firm linked to Malik Riaz – signed an agreement with the Bahria Foundation in 1996 to set up Bahria Town.

The foundation was established in January 1982 as a charitable trust under the Endowment Act 1890. The Bahria Foundation Committee of Administration (COA), headed by the chief of the naval staff, consists of eight members, including the foundation’s managing director.


Court rules against real estate tycoon in decade-old case over right to use naval nomenclature


Under the agreement that Mr Riaz signed with the foundation, the naval subsidiary was offered a 10 per cent share for the use of the name ‘Bahria’ for the private housing scheme. The remaining amount was divided between Hussain Global, Malik Riaz and his family members.

In the year 2000, the foundation asked Mr Riaz not to use the ‘Bahria’ name for his housing society and on Feb 24 of the same year, the property mogul signed an agreement with the Bahria Foundation to the same effect.

Agreeing not to use the name permanently, Mr Riaz’ people did request that they may be allowed to retain the name for another 18 months.

However, in 2002, Malik Riaz obtained a stay order from a local court, alleging that Bahria Foundation has forced him to sign the agreement.

Since then, the tycoon has expanded his housing project manifold and, to date, has sold a massive number of housing and commercial units in Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi.

Bahria Foundation counsel Sheikh Khizer Rashid told Dawn that the foundation never pressurised Malik Riaz and he agreed not to use the ‘Bahria’ name of his own free will.

“He signed the deal in the presence of the company’s registrar,” he said.

According to him, Mr Riaz did not appear in court to prove the allegation that he was forced to sign the 2002 agreement.

A spokesperson for the navy, when contacted, said that since the court had already passed an order in the matter, he would not comment on it.

Nazir Jawad, a former legal adviser to the housing ministry, told Dawn that Mr Riaz could not use the ‘Bahria’ name until the judgment is suspended or set aside.

“It is a setback for the tycoon and the order endangers agreements Malik Riaz has signed with the national and international firms,” he said.

Mr Jawad said that Mr Riaz had the option of appealing against the decision before a sessions judge and the high court. The order would attain finality if the Supreme Court upheld it, he added.

Published in Dawn, March 28th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Improved outlook
Updated 16 Apr, 2025

Improved outlook

REMITTANCES hit an all-time high of nearly $4.1bn last month, breaking the streak of $3bn per month during the...
Water dispute
16 Apr, 2025

Water dispute

WITH a long, hot summer looming ahead, the last thing the country needs is two provinces fighting over water. Yet,...
A positive start
16 Apr, 2025

A positive start

FROM American threats of bombing Iran, things have taken a more positive turn as President Donald Trump’s emissary...
Iran slayings
Updated 15 Apr, 2025

Iran slayings

State authorities on both sides must investigate latest attack, while Tehran should locate perpetrators and bring them to justice.
AI in the courts
15 Apr, 2025

AI in the courts

SUPREME Court Justices Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mansoor Ali Shah’s judgment on the use of AI in the judiciary landed...
Refusal crisis
15 Apr, 2025

Refusal crisis

PAKISTAN’S polio case count, with 105 days of the year lapsed so far, is in the single digits. But the question ...