Karachi bar lauds Justice Omar Sial for not joining new SHC cohort

Published November 30, 2024
Sindh High Court’s Justice Omar Sial. — SHC website
Sindh High Court’s Justice Omar Sial. — SHC website

KARACHI: The Karachi Bar As­­sociation (KBA) on Friday appla­uded Justice Omar Sial for declining to become part of the constitutional bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC).

The KBA through a resolution welcomed Justice Sial’s decision after he recused himself from joining the constitutional bench, says a statement.

In a letter to Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, the head of the constitutional bench, Justice Sial argued that benches should be constituted on a “seniority basis”.

The KBA praised Justice Sial for his “principled stance” in refusing to join the “so-called constitutional bench,” formed by the Judicial Commission of Pakistan. The association termed it a “violation of the seniority principle” and a disregard for the opinion of the SHC’s chief justice, and claimed that bench was formed at the behest of the executive and politicians.

“As rightly pointed out by the learned judge, this has created a dangerous perception of executive interference in the judiciary and erodes the very fabric of democracy,” the statement said.

The judges of Supreme and high courts had taken the oath to protect, preserve and defend the Constitution, the KBA pointed out, adding that Justice Sial’s commitment to his oath should serve as an example for all judges.

The KBA condemned the “manner” in which eight senior judges had allegedly been overlooked in the selection of the head of the constitutional bench.

Eight senior judges of the SHC, who have the most constitutional law expertise, were ignored to pick the head of the constitutional bench, the KBA alleged.

Alluding to the head of the constitutional bench, the KBA claimed that the learned judge is known to have a long association with the ruling party in Sindh, creating a perception that the executive and legislators are handpicking the judges they feel may be favourably inclined towards them. “This is seriously harmful to the image of the judiciary,” it cautioned.

The KBA also said that after the 26th amendment, judicial delays in Karachi had multiplied instead of being reduced, as it replaced five benches for constitutional petitions with a single bench. It also de­­plored the Supreme Court registry’s failure to list numerous petitions challenging the 26th Amendment.

Published in Dawn, November 30th, 2024

Editorial

Shocking ambush
Updated 13 Mar, 2025

Shocking ambush

The sophistication of attack indicates that separatists likely had support from experienced external players.
Suffocating crisis
13 Mar, 2025

Suffocating crisis

THREE of the five countries with the most polluted air on Earth are in South Asia. They include Pakistan, which has...
Captive grid
13 Mar, 2025

Captive grid

IT is a common practice: the government makes commitments with global lenders for their money and then tries to...
State Bank’s caution
Updated 12 Mar, 2025

State Bank’s caution

Easing monetary policy will be difficult for SBP without large, sustainable foreign capital inflows and structural tax reforms.
Syria massacre
12 Mar, 2025

Syria massacre

THERE were valid fears of sectarian and religious bloodshed when anti-Assad militants triumphantly marched into...
Too little, too late
12 Mar, 2025

Too little, too late

WHEN desperation reaches a point that a father has to end his life to save his daughter’s, the state has failed ...